• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number 610-0001
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Corneal Edema (1791); Loss of Vision (2139)
Event Date 01/10/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record for the manufacturing lot was reviewed and the device met all release criteria and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings that relate to the reported event.The explanted corneal inlay has not been returned to the manufacturer at this time.Corneal swelling, inlay shifts in position, inlay removal, and decreased visual acuity are listed in the device labeling as potential risks.(b)(4).Date emdr submitted to fda: 03/03/2017.Reference mdr# 3005956347-2017-00013 for the event involving the initial inlay.
 
Event Description
A replacement raindrop corneal inlay was implanted in the patient's left eye on (b)(6) 2017.Reference mdr# 3005956347-2017-00013, which was filed for an adverse event involving the first inlay implanted in this patient.Additional information was received and it was learned that one day following inlay exchange, there was significant corneal flap edema and bcdva had worsened to 20/80.On (b)(6) 2017, the replacement inlay was fully decentered and the patient's bcdva was 20/40.The inlay was explanted on (b)(6) 2017.One week post explantation, bcdva improved to 20/30+.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient's bcdva returned to baseline.The inlay decentration was thought to be caused by patient's anatomy.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The explanted inlay was returned to the manufacturer and subjected to visual microscopic inspection and dimensional analysis.The findings revealed that the inlay was damaged with a tear and some scratches and abrasions were observed on the inlay.The damaged condition of the device is consistent with the findings for corneal inlays that have been explanted.The edge thickness and diameter were measured and found to be within specifications.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key6378961
MDR Text Key69094213
Report Number3005956347-2017-00025
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
UDI-Device Identifier10850394006013
UDI-Public(01)10850394006013(17)190916(10)002999
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150034
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/11/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/04/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/16/2019
Device Model Number610-0001
Device Lot Number002999
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/21/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/29/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/16/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FEMTOSECOND LASER FOR CREATION OF CORNEAL FLAP
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
-
-