• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROFRAME 10 ADVANCED; EMBOLIZATION COIL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. HYDROFRAME 10 ADVANCED; EMBOLIZATION COIL Back to Search Results
Model Number 7110-0415-A2
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult To Position (1467); Stretched (1601)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number was provided, and the device history records are being reviewed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer.The investigation is currently underway.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during positioning of the last embolization coil in a basilar artery aneurysm, the microcatheter kept backing out as the coil was being advanced.During an attempt to remove the coil and the microcatheter, the coil appeared to break or stretch.The coil was then intentionally detached with the controller; however, the coil detached at one of the pusher wire zones, which resulted in two detached segments left behind in the patient.The detached coil and pusher zone were successfully retrieved with a snare device.There was no reported patient injury.The patient is reported to be stable and in good condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was received for evaluation inside a catheter with partial pusher exposed.The implant coil was detached and stretched at the proximal end.The distal black pet was burnt, indicating several detachment attempts.The monofilament exposed on the marker band proximal end shows thermal cycling, as well as tensile pull.The pusher resistance was noted to be within specification.Based on the investigation and provided information, the complaint cannot be confirmed.The root cause cannot be determined.The implant stretch was most likely caused due to snagging at the stent wall when the catheter snapped back from the aneurysm sac.The implant coil may have been resheathed and exposed in between the stent and the vessel wall.The detachment attempt may have been made when the implant coil was still in the vessel, outside the catheter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HYDROFRAME 10 ADVANCED
Type of Device
EMBOLIZATION COIL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
1311 valencia avenue
tustin CA 92780
Manufacturer Contact
debby callahan
1311 valencia avenue
tustin, CA 92780
7142478000
MDR Report Key6378969
MDR Text Key69095576
Report Number2032493-2017-00054
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K161367
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/04/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date10/31/2021
Device Model Number7110-0415-A2
Device Lot Number161117F9
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/07/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/01/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-