• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DENTSPLY PROFESSIONAL MIDWEST E HIGH SPEED ATTACHMENT 1:5 HS FO CA; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DENTSPLY PROFESSIONAL MIDWEST E HIGH SPEED ATTACHMENT 1:5 HS FO CA; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 875005
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Though no medical/surgical intervention was required to preclude a serious injury in this event, there have been previously reported events involving a similar device that resulted in the need for medical/surgical intervention to preclude permanent damage to a body structure or permanent impairment of a body function.Therefore, this event meets the criteria for reportability per 21 cfr part 803.The device is available for evaluation, though results are not available as of this report.Evaluation results will be submitted as they become available.
 
Event Description
In this event it was reported that the cap unscrewed from a midwest e 1:5 while in use.The reported complaint did not result in an injury or need for intervention.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As received, the attachment could support the reported complaint however, a root cause could not be determined production and quality testing of the attachment was not performed as the device was not in working condition.The attachment was then microscopically evaluated by quality personnel.Both bearings were detached from the set assembly.The bur end bearing outer race was stuck inside the head cavity.Both bearing retainers looked good with no evidence of wear.Some debris was observed inside head cavity.Cap cavity looked good.Minor wear was observed on the head gears.Some debris was also observed within the cap and head threads.The bur was rusted as received.Contact was also seen between cap button and pusher.Attachment was sent to sycotec for further evaluation.Results from sycotec stated: the head housing shows strong damage and deformations, presumably from a fall.The key surface from the push button shows dents.The inner side of the push button and also the surface of the pressure pieces shows heavy seizing marks, this is a sign that both had contact while running.The teeth of the drive shaft and also the cartridge are heavily worn.The surface of the inner and outer ring from the ball bearing shows also traces of wear.The balls are missing.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MIDWEST E HIGH SPEED ATTACHMENT 1:5 HS FO CA
Type of Device
HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
DENTSPLY PROFESSIONAL
901 west oakton st.
des plaines IL 60018
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYCOTEC GMBH & CO KG
wangener strasse 78
leutkirch baden-wurttemberg, 88299
GM   88299
Manufacturer Contact
helen lewis
221 w. philadelphia st.
suite 60w
york, PA 17401
7178494229
MDR Report Key6394099
MDR Text Key69869837
Report Number1419322-2017-00028
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EGS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K132356
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/09/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number875005
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/10/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/07/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/18/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-