|
Model Number ONXANE-21 |
Device Problem
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
Patient Problem
Organ Dehiscence (2502)
|
Event Date 02/08/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
|
|
Event Description
|
Implant registration cards received indicate patient implanted on (b)(6) 2017 with both an onxane-21 sn (b)(4) and onxane-23, sn (b)(4) in the aortic position.Note: this investigation is relegated to the onxane-21 additional information via operative notes indicate that both attempts at implant were unsuccessful.A patient with severe aortic stenosis and severe aortic insufficiency was sized for the onxane-23, sn (b)(4) [investigated separately], "however , the valve could not be successfully advanced past the sinotubular junction.Efforts to implant the 23 mm valve and [subsequent] manipulations necessary to implant the 21 mm valve resulted in inadvertent partial thickness destruction of the aortic wall adjacent to the right coronary artery.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturing records for the onxane-21 (b)(4) were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.During the investigation no non-conformances or deviations were noted.All affected lots were found to be dimensionally similar and are therefore, unrelated to the reported events.A review of the available information was performed.The onxane-23 (b)(4) implant attempted (b)(6) 2017 in the aortic position of (b)(6) female.The surgeon could not get the valve to seat properly despite sizer indicating otherwise.The valve was removed and replaced with onxane-21 (b)(4).Annular tissue reconstruction resulted in positioning of the valve such that there was possible inadequate clearance for the left main coronary ostium and particularly for the right main coronary ostium.This valve was also removed and the patient received a medtronic hancock ii porcine bioprosthesis which seemed to provide the necessary clearance.The operative report was made available.There are two parts to this complaint.The first is the mis-sizing and the second is the ostia clearance.For the first, the surgeon says the sizer fit, but the corresponding valve did not.It is not clear whether the surgeon sized for the valve before or after placement of the sutures.This matters because suture placement, especially pledgeted sutures, can affect the actual annulus diameter and subsequent valve fit.After feedback from the field, on-x now manufactures a second set of sizers to take pledgets into account and it is surgeon preference as to which set is used.The record made available to us does not indicate which set was used for this case.For the second part, reconfiguration of a surgically altered annulus resulted in an unusual anatomical shape rendering abnormal positioning of the coronary ostia relative to valve placement. the ostia were, in effect, lower than normal.Root cause for this event is mis-sizing of the valve annulus and the reshaped annulus created an abnormal positioning of coronary ostia relative to valve placement.Surgeon training on valve sizing is recommended.No further action warranted on coronary ostia blockage issue due to unusual anatomy.
|
|
Event Description
|
Implant registration cards received indicate patient implanted on (b)(6) 2017 with both an onxane21 (b)(4) and onxane23, (b)(4) in the aortic position.Note: this investigation is relegated to the onxane21 additional information via operative notes indicate that both attempts at implant were unsuccessful.A patient with severe aortic stenosis and severe aortic insufficiency was sized for the onxane23, (b)(4) [investigated separately], "however , the valve could not be successfully advanced past the sinotubular junction.Efforts to implant the 23 mm valve and [subsequent] manipulations necessary to implant the 21 mm valve resulted in inadvertent partial thickness destruction of the aortic wall adjacent to the right coronary artery.".
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|