(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported resistance during advancement and patient effects appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.The reported patient effect of ischemia, as listed in the absorb gt1 instructions for use (ifu), is a known adverse event associated with the use of a coronary scaffold in native coronary arteries.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|