• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LUMENIS, LTD. M22; INTENSE PULSE LIGHT DELIVERY DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LUMENIS, LTD. M22; INTENSE PULSE LIGHT DELIVERY DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number M22
Device Problem Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect (1209)
Patient Problem Burn(s) (1757)
Event Date 02/17/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Lumenis investigated the reported event by contacting the user facility directly.Attempts have been made by phone to obtain; patient treatment settings, patient information, patient photos, and sun exposure.No information has been provided by the user facility.An examination of the subject device by a lumenis technical expert concluded that upon arrival the technical expert found the ipl handpiece to be delivering approx.20% higher energy than the display screen settings.Following preventative maintenance and performing energy calibrations, the technical expert stated that the subject device met all lumenis manufacture specifications and was returned back to service at the user facility.Lumenis is continuing its investigation.When additional information becomes available, the complaint record will be updated accordingly, and a follow-up medwatch report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
A user facility reported that one (1) patient sustained a burn of unknown severity to an unknown anatomical area following ipl treatment with a lumenis m22 laser.No report of serious injury or medical intervention has been received except for the initial report from the user facility.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A lumenis quality engineer reviewed the reported event details and concluded by stating, "although the handpiece energy deviated from the desired value, it was within the safety requirement of +/- 20% energy deviation." additionally, the quality engineer consulted with a lumenis clinical affairs manager who stated, "such deviation although outputting higher energy is within the safety limits, furthermore the user is required to make a test patch to ensure no adverse event happening." the quality engineer concluded that the subject device operated within lumenis specifications and that the reported event is not due to a system malfunction.A review of device labeling found the following caution: "the energy output of a treatment head decreases over time.Thus, if calibration is performed after a long time interval, the energy emitted after the calibration may be higher than before the calibration, for the same setting.Make sure to perform a test patch before starting treatment.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
M22
Type of Device
INTENSE PULSE LIGHT DELIVERY DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
LUMENIS, LTD.
6 hakidma street
po box 240
yokneam industrial park, 20692
IS  20692
Manufacturer (Section G)
LUMENIS, LTD.
6 hakidma street
po box 240
yokneam industrial park, 20692
IS   20692
Manufacturer Contact
brett godfrey
1870 south milestone drive
salt lake city, UT 84104
8016562663
MDR Report Key6424975
MDR Text Key70581242
Report Number3004135191-2017-00036
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K083733
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type user facility
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/22/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/22/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM22
Device Catalogue NumberGA-0005200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/01/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/02/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Congenital Anomaly; Other;
-
-