Catalog Number PAH111002E |
Device Problems
Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Difficult to Remove (1528); Physical Resistance (2578)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/10/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The review of the manufacturing records verified that this lot met all pre-release specifications.(b)(4).Further investigation is being conducted and the information will be included in the final report.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient presented with a thrombosed aneurysm in the popliteal artery which was intended to be treated with two gore® viabahn® endoprostheses.The proximal part of the popliteal artery was measured with 9mm in diameter, the distal part was measured with 11mm in diameter.Therefore the case was planned to have a pah091002e implanted proximally and a pah111002e distally.It was reported to gore that when the distal gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was implanted, deployment of the endoprosthesis stopped suddenly after 80% of the endoprosthesis was deployed.It was stated that some force was requested to continue device deployment.After the endoprosthesis was successfully deployed the device catheter could be removed but the deployment line remained on the endoprosthesis and could not be removed.Therefore the decision was made to implant a bare metal stent proximal to the first implanted gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis to fixate the deployment line on the patient¿s artery wall.After the bare metal stent was implanted a third gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis was implanted between the proximal and distal one to ensure a good alignment and deployment line fixation.After the endoprosthesis was successfully deployed and device catheter was removed a visual inspection proofed that the remaining deployment line caught up on the device catheter and could be removed together.The patient presented with a good blood flow in the upper limb and is doing well following the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Our engineers have evaluated the returned device.Their investigation showed following: the delivery catheter was returned without the endoprosthesis, deployment line, or deployment knob.The returned components were unremarkable.As such, no conclusions can be made regarding the observed deployment difficulties.Engineering evaluation conclusion is inconclusive as it relates to the event description.Based on the device examination performed, no manufacturing anomalies were identified.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|