• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS ARCOM XL 44-36 STD HMRL BRNG; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS ARCOM XL 44-36 STD HMRL BRNG; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Difficult To Position (1467)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/31/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).(b)(4).Medical product - unknown humeral bearing, cat#: ni lot#: ni; unknown humeral tray, cat#: ni lot#: ni.Customer has indicated that the product is in process of being returned to zimmer biomet for investigation.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
 
Event Description
During a shoulder arthroplasty, the humeral bearing would not seat into the humeral tray.Another humeral bearing was used to complete the procedure.No adverse events have been reported as a result of the malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.Concomitant medical products: medical product - comp rvs tray co 44mm, cat#: 115370 lot#: 209790; arcom xl 44-36 std hmrl brng, cat#: xl-115363 lot#: 253430.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.Complaint sample was evaluated and the reported event was confirmed.Product was visually examined.The polyethylene bearing has circular abrasions indicating impaction.The lip where the locking ring locks into place is damaged.The slot also has damage noted.A dimensional review is not possible due to the damage to the poly.The complaint is considered to be confirmed due to the damage to the poly which would have prevented it from seating.Device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no discrepancies relevant to the reported event were found.Review of the complaint history determined that no further action(s) is/are required.This issue was previously addressed by preventative action where a training video was distributed to the field, an optional bearing assembly tool was created, and surgical technique was updated.Root cause was unable to be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARCOM XL 44-36 STD HMRL BRNG
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
christina arnt
56 e. bell dr.
warsaw, IN 46582
5745273773
MDR Report Key6437485
MDR Text Key70987306
Report Number0001825034-2017-02126
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PAO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK080642
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/20/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/27/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date12/22/2021
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberXL-115363
Device Lot Number488870
Other Device ID NumberSEE NARRATIVE IN H10
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/09/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/22/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
-
-