SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. ADVIA CENTAUR XP FT4; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY, FREE THYROXINE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/19/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The initial result was tested with a different reagent readypack to the repeat result.The patient samples are serum samples and are tested in the primary tube.The sample tubes are gel barrier 8.5 ml biogen tubes (expiration date: 12/2017).The sample tubes are centrifugated for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm.When the samples are re-tested on a different day, the samples are stored capped at 4-8 degrees c.The cause for the discordant ft4 result is unknown.Siemens healthcare diagnostics is investigating.The ifu states in the interpretation of results section: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with patient's medical history, clinical presentation and other findings.".
|
|
Event Description
|
Discordant advia centaur xp ft4 results were obtained for samples from several patients when repeat testing was performed after recalibration of the assay.The ft4 assay was recalibrated due to quality control (qc) values out of range.Patient treatment was not prescribed or altered.There was no report of adverse health consequences due to the discordant ft4 result.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Siemens filed the initial mdr 1219913-2017-00065 on march 28, 2017.On 03/23/2017 additional information: siemens was provided with the water test samples from the customer site.It seems that the water reservoir is contaminated.The customer was asked to replace the water reservoir with a clean one.On (b)(6), the water reservoir was decontaminated and monthly maintenance was performed by the customer.On (b)(6), the ft4 quality controls were run and were below 2sd and 3sd.The ft4 assay calibration was performed on (b)(6) and the quality controls were in range.After recalibrating the ft4 assay on (b)(6), the quality controls were in range.The customer was sent reagent lot 076 for use.Siemens is awaiting for an update when reagent lot 076 is in use by the customer.Siemens continues to investigate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Siemens filed the initial mdr 1219913-2017-00065 on march 28, 2017.Siemens filed the mdr 1219913-2017-00065 supplemental report 1 on april 20, 2017.On 06/02/2017 additional information: the performance of ft4 lot 076 was reported to show the same calibration stability as lot 075.The customer has to re-calibrate every 4 to 5 days when controls are out of range high or low.Siemens continues to investigate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Siemens filed the initial mdr 1219913-2017-00065 on march 28, 2017.Siemens filed the mdr 1219913-2017-00065 supplemental report 1 on april 20, 2017.Siemens filed the mdr 1219913-2017-00065 supplemental report 2 on june 19, 2017.07/18/2017 additional information: siemens performed the investigation with a testing protocol that left the ft4 readypacks for lot 075 and 076 on the instrument for seven days and the biorad lyphochek immunoassay plus control (n=1) were run for seven consecutive days without recalibrating.Ft4 reagent lots 075 and 076 with calibrator a lot 91 and biorad controls lot 40310 were used.Advia centaur xp ft4 lot 075, 40311, 40312, 40313; day 1 0.630 1.92 2.85; day 2 0.660 1.78 3.05; day 3 0.680 1.90 3.09; day 4 0.670 1.89 2.90; day 5 0.650 1.88 2.99; day 6 0.680 1.93 2.97; day 7 0.680 1.86 2.86; mean 0.664 1.88 2.96.Advia centaur xp ft4 lot 076, 40311, 40312, 40313; day 1 0.790 1.98 3.26; day 2 0.690 1.83 3.05; day 3 0.640 1.97 3.35; day 4 0.710 1.87 3.09; day 5 0.680 1.91 2.96; day 6 0.690 1.78 3.00; day 7 0.610 1.90 2.97; mean 0.687 1.89 3.10.Advia centaur xp: mean: range: units: 40311 0.735 0.553-0.917 ng/dl; 40312 1.96 1.54-2.37 ng/dl 40313 3.17 2.52-3.83 ng/dl.All control results, on both reagent lots, on every day, were within biorad package insert ranges.Siemens has not confirmed the customer's observation.The cause for the discordant ft4 result is unknown.The instrument is performing within specifications.No further evaluation of the device is required.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|