• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GYRUS ACMI, INC. GYRUS PK; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GYRUS ACMI, INC. GYRUS PK; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/02/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was in the process of having a robotic sacrocolpopexy, oophorectomy, and enterolysis surgery.The gyrus generator malfunctioned during tissue coagulation.The patient remained stable during this procedure.The device was removed from the operating suite and replaced with a working device.Management was notified, the device was tagged and a work order was placed.Gyrus generator was not working properly during procedure.The generator was switched with another working unit without any further malfunctions.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GYRUS PK
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
GYRUS ACMI, INC.
2925 appling rd.
bartlett TN 38133
MDR Report Key6442422
MDR Text Key71149518
Report Number6442422
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/29/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Unknown
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA03/08/2017
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer03/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age68 YR
-
-