Catalog Number 1234300-12 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Stenosis (2263); Test Result (2695)
|
Event Date 03/07/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Concomitant medical products: stent: xience alpine: 3.0 x 33 mm, 2.7 5 x 12 mm, 2.5 x 12 mm, other: absorb gt1: 2.5 x 18 mm, 2.5 x 28 mm.The scaffold remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure on (b)(6) 2016 was to treat a long lesion (70-99% stenosis) in the left anterior descending (lad) artery and 1st diagonal (d1) artery.The patient presented with unstable angina.Pre-dilatation was performed on all lesions reducing the stenosis to less than 40%.A 2.5 x 18 mm absorb gt1 scaffold was implanted in the distal lad and two absorb gt1 scaffolds (3.0 x 12 mm and 2.5 x 28 mm) were implanted in the mid lad.A 3.0 x 33 mm xience alpine failed to cross to treat the proximal lad so additional pre-dilatation was done with a 3.0 x 12 mm non-abbott balloon and a new 3.0 x 33 mm xience alpine and a 2.75 x 12 mm xience alpine were implanted in the proximal lad.A 2.5 x 12 mm xience alpine was implanted in the ostium of the d1.All implants were post-dilated with unspecified balloons, reducing the stenosis to less than 10%.The patient was discharged on dual antiplatelet drug therapy (dapt) of plavix and aspirin.The patient returned for a new procedure on (b)(6) 2017 due to positive stress test (asymptomatic) and it was observed that a restenosis was present in the 3.0 x 12 mm absorb gt1 scaffold in the mid lad.The restenosis was treated with a 2.75 x 12 mm xience alpine and post-dilatation with a 3.0 x 6 mm non-abbott balloon at 16 atmospheres.The patient condition is good.It was confirmed that the patient had been complaint with dapt.No changes were made in the prescribed dapt.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).There was no reported device malfunction and the product was not returned as the scaffold remains in the anatomy.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.The reported patient effects of restenosis, as listed in the absorb gt1 instructions for use, is a known adverse event associated with the use of a coronary scaffold in native coronary arteries.Based on the case information and related record review, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|