• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97702
Device Problems Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Cramp(s) (2193); Chest Tightness/Pressure (2463)
Event Date 03/03/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for failed back surgery syndrome and spinal pain.The patient reported that she met with a manufacturer¿s representative (rep) a week or so ago and she reprogrammed her stimulator and had given it enough time.The patient reported that she needed to reprogram it.The patient reported that instead of going down her left leg stimulation was so great around her ribcage.The patient reported that it was squeezing her ribcage and that happened only when she reclined.The patient reported that she wanted help to use the patient programmer to change stimulation so she could be more comfortable until she could meet with a rep again.The patient was initially on group a at 5.40 and the patient reported successfully changing to group b and increased to a comfortable setting.The patient reported that she felt stimulation in both legs.The issue resolved at the time of the report.No further complications anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.It was reported that she had terrible pain in the left leg that had gotten progressively worse over the weeks.Stimulation was on and patient increased stimulation from 7.60 to 8.20.The patient further mentioned that if stimulation was too high she felt binding feeling in chest.The patient subsequently reported that she was having cramping in the legs with waves of pain.The patient confirmed it was all the same pain that she was having previously.The patient changed from group b at 8.2 to group c and turned it up to 9.10 and could feel stimulation.The patient said she was still in pain and inquired which setting was for her left side.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.It was reported that the patient's left leg was still very painful; there was excruciating pain.The chest problem had been resolved with lowering the number in the stimulator.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6450381
MDR Text Key71485220
Report Number3004209178-2017-06787
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109513
UDI-Public00643169109513
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/31/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/14/2017
Device Model Number97702
Device Catalogue Number97702
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/01/2017
Date Device Manufactured12/14/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age77 YR
Patient Weight98
-
-