• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SYNCHROMED II; PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SYNCHROMED II; PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 8637-40
Device Problems Excess Flow or Over-Infusion (1311); Application Program Problem (2880); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 02/04/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
References the main component of the device system; the other relevant components include: product id: neu_ptm_prog, serial# unknown, product type: programmer, patient.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a foreign healthcare professional (hcp) via a manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was receiving hydromorphone 10.0 mg/ml at 0.500 mg/day and clonidine 100.0 mcg/ml at 5.00 mcg/day via intrathecal drug delivery pump for an unknown indication of use.It was reported that there were multiple bolus request (88) and denials (89) that occurred.No further information was reported and there were no symptoms reported.Additional information received.It was previously noted that the drug in the pump was hydromorphone and additional information indicates that the correct drug is hydromorphone.The serial number of the patient¿s personal therapy manager (ptm) was not known when asked.It was reported that the manufacturer representative was not aware of a bolus lockouts and there was no allegation of any bolus lockouts.There was no patient involvement in the event.The suspected cause for the bolus lockouts was patient error.There were no diagnostics/troubleshooting that was performed and no actions/interventions were taken.There were no reported complications.Additional information was received from a foreign consumer via a manufacturer¿s representative.The pump was newly implanted, but the patient was complaining of not being able to get the ptm doses at the right time.He knew about the 24-hour rolling adjustment, but what he said did not match what the hcp would expect the pump to do.The patient was not convinced the pump control function was working correctly.An example of times of ¿mogul application¿ was given.Wednesday, (b)(6) 2017 : 1st: 4:47 am, 2nd: 10:25 am, 3rd: 12:33 pm, 4th: 3:18 pm, 5th: 4:32 pm, 6th: 9:17 pm, 7th: 10:20 pm.Thursday, (b)(6) 2017 : 1st: 1:15 am, 2nd: 5:50 am, 3rd: 7:19 am, 4th: 8:22 am, 5th: 9:38 am, 6th: 6:02 pm, 7th: 10:00 pm.The patient stated they were restricted to 7 ¿moguls¿ per day for a 24-hour period from 12 midnight to 12 midnight.They understood that they should be similarly restricted on a rolling 24-hour bolus.They stated that from the given example of bolus applications, 11 successful ¿mogul applications¿ were allowed from wednesday, (b)(6) 2017 at 10:25 am, to thursday, (b)(6) 2017 at 10:25 am.They had noticed this happening on a number of other occasions, and they have also been refused ¿mogul applications¿ sometimes when they could see no reason why.They stated they had lost confidence with the pump.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The previously reported (b)(4) no longer applies to this event.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
On 2017-apr-04, additional information was received from a foreign manufacturer representative (rep).Additional information reported the patient was using a personal therapy manager (ptm) and was not getting "the therapy they need".The rep was looking for a better way to program the pump.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received.It was reported that the cause of the patient receiving more than their 7 allotted boluses in the 24-hour rolling period was not determined.No further complications were reported and/or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCHROMED II
Type of Device
PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6456621
MDR Text Key71826898
Report Number3004209178-2017-06960
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LKK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
P860004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/04/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/14/2017
Device Model Number8637-40
Device Catalogue Number8637-40
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/18/2017
Date Device Manufactured01/20/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age69 YR
-
-