• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD CATHETER MOUNT; BZO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD CATHETER MOUNT; BZO Back to Search Results
Model Number RT021
Device Problems Crack (1135); Split (2537)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/07/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The rt021 is sold in the usa but has no 510(k) number as it is considered a class i device.We are currently in the process of obtaining further information from the hospital to determine if the complaint rt021 catheter mount caused or contributed to the reported event.We will provide a follow up report upon completion of our investigation.
 
Event Description
A hospital in (b)(6) reported via a fisher & paykel healthcare field representative that the rt021 catheter mount tubings have "split".This was found before patient use.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The rt021 is sold in the usa but has no 510(k) number as it is considered a class i device.Method: six complaint rt021 catheter mounts (two units in unsealed bags and four units in sealed bags) and additional (b)(4) catheter mounts in sealed bags were returned to fisher & paykel healthcare in (b)(4) for investigation, and were visually inspected.In addition, two of the returned complaint units (in sealed bags) were leak tested.Results: visual inspection revealed that the tubing cuff of the returned complaint catheter mounts had split at the connector end.Leak test of the two returned complaint units (in sealed bags) revealed that these units were out of specification.No fault was found with the returned sealed (b)(4) catheter mounts.Conclusion: we are unable to determine the cause of the damage observed on the returned rt021 catheter mounts.All rt021 catheter mounts are pressure tested prior to being released for distribution.Any catheter mount with a split tube would have failed the pressure test.This suggests that the returned catheter mounts were damaged after they were released for distribution.Our user instructions that accompany the rt021 catheter mount state the following: check all connections are tight before use.Perform a pressure and leak test on the breathing system and check for occlusions before connecting to a patient.
 
Event Description
A hospital in (b)(6) reported via a fisher & paykel healthcare field representative that the rt021 catheter mount tubings have "split".This was found before patient use.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CATHETER MOUNT
Type of Device
BZO
Manufacturer (Section D)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, 2013
NZ  2013
Manufacturer (Section G)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, 2013
NZ   2013
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan stevens
173 technology drive
suite 100
irvine, CA 92618
9494534000
MDR Report Key6470905
MDR Text Key72428764
Report Number9611451-2017-00309
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BZO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
SEE H10
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/07/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRT021
Device Catalogue NumberRT021
Device Lot Number2100095405
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/30/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/19/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-