(b)(4).Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.(b)(6).Device is not distributed in the united states.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot number 5m53150.Manufacturing location:(b)(4).Supplier: external supplier (b)(4).Date of manufacture: 16.Mar.2016.Expiration date: 31.Dec.2018.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture or sterilization of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production or sterilization of the subject device.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
A product investigation was completed: the investigation of the trauma needle kit was performed in the linked complaint (b)(40 and has shown that according to our assessment, this is a handling error of the user.Substantiation: the only possibility to unlock the needle from the pnfa-system is to press the mechanical release.It is likely that the lock was not actuated.This would explain, as mentioned in the report, the needle could still be twisted, but could not be withdrawn from the system.According to the received information it cannot be excluded that the leakage could be an outcome of the banging in the attempt to remove the needle that was stuck in the blade, then the leakage may have been the cause of the pain.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|