It was reported that on (b)(6) 2016, the surgeon implanted a silicone pip implant (size 1).Patient went back to activities of daily living and thinks she remembers an incident where she felt the implant give away.The surgeon scheduled her for a revision surgery to replace the fractured silicone implant with a new one.On (b)(6) 2017 surgeon removed the broken implant and replaced with a silicone pip (size 2) implant.Surgeon was not overly concerned and understands that a silicone implant, over time, can wear down and fractured.
|
Integra has completed their internal investigation on may 3, 2017.Results: evaluation of returned device; the explanted device was returned, and visual failure analysis was performed.It was confirmed that the spip was returned in two pieces.No tool marks were visible on the stem.The failure timeline could not be determined (i.E.Sharp break or gradual); however, it appears that it may have been sudden based on the nature of the report.Dhr review; review of manufacturing records showed no evidence of a nonconformance that may have caused or contributed to the reported event.Complaints history; this complaint is the only complaint of post-operative spip breakage from january 2012 to present.During this period of time, there have been (b)(4) spip surgeries performed.This represents a (b)(4) overall failure rate.Conclusion: based on the information received to date, the root cause cannot be determined.The patient reported that she returned to activities of daily living and thinks she remembers an incident where she felt the implant give way; however, it is unknown if there was some sort of trauma or injury that occurred at the time she felt the implant give way.
|