• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD CATHETER MOUNT; BZO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD CATHETER MOUNT; BZO Back to Search Results
Model Number RT021
Device Problems Break (1069); Split (2537)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The rt021 catheter mount is sold in the usa but has no 510(k) number as it is considered a class i device.The complaint rt021 catheter mounts were recently received at fph in new zealand for evaluation.We are in the process of conducting our investigation to determine if fph's products caused or contributed to the reported event.We will provide a follow up report upon completion of our investigation.
 
Event Description
A distributor in (b)(6) reported via a fisher & paykel healthcare (fph) field representative that some rt021 catheter mounts were 'broken'.No patient consequence was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Pma/510(k): the rt021 catheter mount is sold in the usa but has no 510(k) number as it is considered a class i device.Manufacturer narrative method: the complaint rt021 catheter mounts were returned to fph (b)(4), and were visually inspected.Result: visual inspection revealed that the tubing cuff had split at the connector end, while others had split at the swivel end.Conclusion: further investigation was conducted and it was determined that the splitting had occurred due to the inherent residual stress present on the extruded tube, which is a sourced component from an external supplier.We have since informed the supplier about the residual stress present on the extruded tube.We also made some improvements to our assembly process in an effort to mitigate the problem.All rt021 catheter mounts are pressure tested prior to release for distribution.Any catheter mount with a split tube would have failed the pressure test and be rejected from the production line.Our user instructions that accompany the rt021 catheter mount state the following: - "check all connections are tight before use." - "perform a pressure and leak test on the breathing system and check for occlusions before connecting to a patient.".
 
Event Description
A distributor in (b)(4) reported via a fisher & paykel healthcare (fph) field representative that some rt021 catheter mounts were "broken".No patient consequence was reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CATHETER MOUNT
Type of Device
BZO
Manufacturer (Section D)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, 2013
NZ  2013
Manufacturer (Section G)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, 2013
NZ   2013
Manufacturer Contact
irfanali kermalli
173 technology dr. suite 100
irvine, CA 92618
8007923912
MDR Report Key6525049
MDR Text Key74062230
Report Number9611451-2017-00373
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BZO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
SEE H10
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/27/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberRT021
Device Catalogue NumberRT021
Device Lot NumberLOT:161018 / BATCH:2100094944
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/21/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/18/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-