• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLFLEX¿ ESOPHAGEAL; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY WALLFLEX¿ ESOPHAGEAL; PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M00516740
Device Problem Partial Blockage (1065)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Chest Pain (1776); Pneumothorax (2012)
Event Date 04/05/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The complainant was unable to provide the device lot number.Therefore, the manufacture and expiration dates are unknown.It was reported the device was not used past its expiry date.(b)(4).The complainant indicated that the device remains implanted and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2017 that a wallflex esophageal fully covered stent was implanted to treat an esophagojejunal anastomotic leak in the esophagus during esophagogastroduonenoscopy (egd) with stent placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2017.Reportedly, the patient had previously had a total gastrectomy.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient underwent egd with stent placement procedure.The stent was implanted approximately 4-5 cm above the anastomosis.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient experienced chest pain and underwent computed tomography of thorax, abdomen and pelvis (ct tap) and no abdominal collection was identified.The physician noted an extraluminal gas adjacent to the esophagojejunal anastomosis and extended into the pancreatic resection bed with associated strand changes.The physician suspected an anastomotic leak.Additionally, pleural effusion and intraluminal food debris within the stent were noted.On (b)(6) 2017, using ultrasound guidance, a large left pleural effusion was drained.Reportedly, the patient presented with persistent output from external drain.On (b)(6) 2017, during an esophagogram procedure, hydropneumothorax and patient erosion were noted.The erosion was noted to be adjacent to the proximal end of the stent and approximately 4-5 cm proximal to the anastomosis site.Additionally, intraluminal food debris was again noted.Reportedly, the stent remains implanted and the patient¿s condition was reported stable.According to the complainant, in the physician¿s assessment, the stent eroded through the esophagus and caused the hydropneumothorax.The patient refused any surgical intervention or procedure and is under do not resuscitate (dnr) and do not intubate (dni) order.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
WALLFLEX¿ ESOPHAGEAL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, ESOPHAGEAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key6531176
MDR Text Key74005517
Report Number3005099803-2017-01318
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ESW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K091510
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM00516740
Device Catalogue Number1674
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
-
-