• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problems Break (1069); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Sticking (1597); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 08/13/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by a physician ((b)(4)) and describes the occurrence of device breakage ("the purple handle that allows for insertion of the material broke into three parts and during release, the insert came apart") in a (b)(6) female patient who received essure (batch no.A69943).The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.On (b)(6) 2013, the patient started essure.On (b)(6) 2013, the same day of starting essure, the patient experienced device breakage (seriousness criteria medically significant and clinically significant/intervention required), device deployment issue ("during release, the insert came apart and, as a result, the insert became stuck in the wrong place"), device difficult to use ("it was necessary to remove it in pieces due to difficulty retrieving all of it") and complication of device insertion ("another package had to be opened").The patient was treated with surgery (switch to laparoscopy).Essure was withdrawn.At the time of the report, the device breakage, device deployment issue, device difficult to use and complication of device insertion outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for device breakage, device deployment issue, device difficult to use and complication of device insertion with essure.The reporter commented: during placement of one essure device, the purple handle that allows for insertion of the material broke into three parts.In addition, during release, the insert came apart and, as a result, the insert became stuck in the wrong place.It was therefore necessary to remove it in pieces due to difficulty retrieving all of it.Another package had to be opened.Company causality comment: this medically confirmed spontaneous case report refers to a female patient who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted and during insertion procedure the purple handle that allows for insertion of the material broke into three parts and during release, the insert came apart( seen as device breakage).A laparoscopy was necessary to remove the insert stuck in the wrong place.The reported event is serious due to medical importance and anticipated in essure's reference safety information.During difficult insertions device breakage may occur.In this present case, during placement of one essure device, the purple handle that allows for insertion of the material broke into three parts.In addition, during release, the insert came apart and, as a result, the insert became stuck in the wrong place.It was therefore necessary to remove it in pieces due to difficulty retrieving all of it and a laparoscopy was performed.Taking to account that breakage occurred during essure insertion causality cannot be excluded.This case was regarded as incident since surgical intervention to device removal was required.The product technical analysis and further information has been sought.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On march 3, 2017, bayer received a cluster of essure complaint reports originating from the ansm, health authority of (b)(4), device vigilance database via legal proceedings.Following receipt, bayer consulted ansm in order to obtain the relevant case reference number information.On march 24, 2017, ansm provided the available corresponding case reference numbers to bayer.Upon receipt of this information bayer evaluated and processed the cluster of essure reports within the global safety database by april 12, 2017.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a physician and describes the occurrence of device breakage ("the purple handle that allows for insertion of the material broke into three parts and during release, the insert came apart") in a (b)(6) year-old female patient who had essure (batch no.A69943) inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.Other product or product use issues identified: device difficult to use "it was necessary to remove it in pieces due to difficulty retrieving all of it" on (b)(6) 2013.On (b)(6) 2013, the patient had essure inserted.On the same day, the patient experienced device breakage (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), device deployment issue ("during release, the insert came apart and, as a result, the insert became stuck in the wrong place") and complication of device insertion ("another package had to be opened").The patient was treated with surgery (switch to laparoscopy).Essure was removed on (b)(6) 2013.At the time of the report, the device breakage, device deployment issue and complication of device insertion outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for complication of device insertion, device breakage and device deployment issue with essure.The reporter commented: during placement of one essure device, the purple handle that allows for insertion of the material broke into three parts.In addition, during release, the insert came apart and, as a result, the insert became stuck in the wrong place.It was therefore necessary to remove it in pieces due to difficulty retrieving all of it.Another package had to be opened.The list of device similar incidents contains essure reports received by bayer and older cases received by conceptus coded with the same medra preferred term.In this particular case a search in the database was performed on (b)(4) 2017 for the following meddra preferred term: device breakage.The analysis in the global safety database revealed 1.653 cases.Bayer is closely monitoring the benefit-risk profile of essure.A recent cumulative review of all available data on essure has not yielded any new safety signal with regard to this meddra pt.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on (b)(4) 2017: quality safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Incident: at the time of reporting, there is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM  13353
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM   13353
Manufacturer Contact
k shaw lamberson
100 bayer blvd.
p.o. box 915
whippany, NJ 07981-0915
MDR Report Key6533378
MDR Text Key74024285
Report Number2951250-2017-01839
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/21/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/01/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Device Lot NumberA69943
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/12/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age39 YR
-
-