Was no known reported patient involvement associated with the complained event.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).A device history record (dhr) review was performed on part # 03.812.004, lot # 9504972: manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 12.Jun.2015.No non conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.A product investigation was performed.The following complaint devices were received by customer quality (cq): one t-pal spacer applicator knob ((b)(4)), one t-pal spacer applicator handle ((b)(4)), one t-pal spacer applicator inner shaft (03.812.003/lot unk), one t-pal spacer 10mm x 28mm 7mm height ((b)(4)).A visual inspection, functional test and device history review were performed as part of this investigation.This complaint is confirmed.The t-pal spacer applicator inner shaft is utilized in the t-pal system.After trialing, the applicator inner shaft is installed into the applicator handle and knob assembly until the release button clicks into place.The appropriate spacer is attached by rotating the knob clockwise until the security ring clicks into position displaying a green band.The knob can then continue to be rotated clockwise until tight; the implant will not pivot in this position.The implant can then be advanced into the intervertebral disc space with light hammering.Once in position the applicator knob is rotated counterclockwise until it stops at the security ring, allowing the implant to pivot.The implant can be advanced into the final position with light controlled hammering.Once the implant is in position, it can be detached by pushing the security ring down and simultaneously turning the applicator knob counterclockwise until it stops; the applicator can then be detached from the implanted spacer per relevant technique guide.Upon visual inspection is can be seen that the black shaft portion of the handle and the inner shaft is severely bent, preventing the device from functioning as intended.The three devices were functionally tested and the devices would not be released/separated (03.812.001,.003,.004) due to the damage to shaft.The implant was returned with a portion broken off and was not returned.The broken fragment is approximately 6.06mm to 6.16mm in length.The complaint condition could not be replicated as the shaft is already bent and the implant is already broken.Relevant drawings were reviewed.No drawing issues or discrepancies were noted.The design is adequate for its intended use and did not contribute to this complaint condition.The design, materials and finishing processes were found to be appropriate for the intended use of these devices.A definitive root cause was unable to be determined however the failure mode is consistent with the application of off axis loading or rough handling.During the investigation, no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(4) as follows: it was reported that during a product demonstration using the transforminal posterior atraumatic lumbar (t-pal) instrument set the t-pal inner shaft would not release and appeared to be jammed inside the outer shaff handle.While trailing with the t-pal instruments it was reported that the device worked once to connect and release, but when another attempt was made the inner shaft would connect or release.It was reported that during the second demonstration of use, the inner shaft would not release and appeared jammed.The spacer broke as well.This event occurred during a product demonstration only; there was no patient or procedural involvement.This is report 4 of 4 for complaint (b)(4).
|