Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional device product code is hty.(b)(4).Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device is expected to be returned to the synthes manufacturer for evaluation but has not yet been received.(b)(6).The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The date of manufacture is unknown.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Additional narrative: lot number device returned may 22, 2017.Dhr review was conducted: no ncr's were generated during production that would contribute to the complaint condition.The review of the device history record shows that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to the complaint condition.Manufacturing location: (b)(4) manufacturing date: 23 september 2016.A manufacturer's evaluation was conducted: received condition: the guidewire ø1.25 w/thread-tip w/trocar l150 has been received with the entire threaded tip broken off.The broken off portion measuring approximately 5 mm is not available for investigation.The device is slightly bent.There are severe striations and marks on a length of approximately 20 mm located at approximately 60 mm and some minor striations located at approximately 20 mm from the broken off tip.Dimension: because of the missing front portion the complaint relevant dimensions cannot be checked for dimensional accuracy of the valid manufacturing specifications.The remaining shaft diameter was measured with caliper ref.(b)(4) referring to the actual technical drawing (b)(4) version a and found to meet the specifications.Target dimension of shaft outside diameter 1.25 +0/- 0.07 mm actual dimension of shaft outside diameter 1.24 mm / pass dhr review: the manufacturing documents were reviewed and no complaint related issues were found.This device was manufactured with a lot size of (b)(4) pieces in september 2016.The review of the device history record shows that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to the complaint condition and the correct material 1.4112 / iso 5832-1/d stainless steel was used.Dcrm review: the wires (power driven) - core dossier design and clinical risk management (dcrm) document, (b)(4), rev.A.6, was reviewed and found to adequately address the harm of this complaint condition.Conclusion: a final manufacturing conclusion cannot be presented because of the condition of the product and the received poor clinical information.We determine that the most probable root cause is excessive force through the method of use and associated accumulated damage and wear.No manufacturing related issue was identified and/or confirmed therefore no corrective/preventive action is required.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|