• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO MEDICAL PRODUCTS HANGZHOU SURSHIELD WINGED INFUSION SET; SET, ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO MEDICAL PRODUCTS HANGZHOU SURSHIELD WINGED INFUSION SET; SET, ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1SV*S23BL
Device Problems Device Issue (2379); Split (2537)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Udi - not required for this product code/lot number combination.The actual device was not returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Event Description
The user facility reported a needle stick with the involved surshield winged infusion set.Follow up communication with the user facility confirmed the following information: the lab tech used the product on the patient and noticed while deploying the safety device it was split down the middle; the device was disposed of in a sharps container; prior to this incident two of the techs were stuck with a needle; and the tech indicated it may have been the glove that caused the safety device to grab the excess of the glove; and all lab tech went to the er to get checked out, but came back to work after.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted as follow up no.To provide the retention sample evaluation results.The actual device has not been returned to the manufacturing facility.Therefore, the investigation is based on the user facility information and evaluation of retention samples from the reported product code/lot number combination.Visual inspection revealed no defects.The angle of the safety shield was evaluated and confirmed to meet manufacturer specification.The safety unit was successfully activated, and revealed no damage had been made.Breakage resistance test was conducted and revealed no defects.Functional testing was conducted and could not reproduce the reported defect.A review of the manufacturing record of the product code/lot# combination was conducted with no relevant findings.A review of the complaint record for the last two years was conducted with no relevant findings.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.(b)(4).All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted as follow up no.2 to provide the device return date and the returned sample evaluation results.The actual device was not returned to the manufacturing facility for evaluation, however, 38 unused samples were returned for evaluation.Therefore, the investigation was based on the evaluation of user facility information and evaluation of retention samples and 38 unused samples from the reported product code/lot number combination.Visual inspection of the retention samples revealed no defects.The angle of the safety shield was inspected and confirmed to meet manufacture specification.Activation of safety shield was conducted successfully and revealed no defects.Visual inspection of the retuned unused samples revealed no defects.The angle of the safety shield was inspected and confirmed to meet manufacture specification.Activation of safety shield was conducted successfully and revealed no defects.Specification.Function testing was conducted on both retention samples and on the returned unused samples and could not reproduce the reported defect.A review of the inspection records of the involved product/lot# combination confirmed that there were no relevant findings.A search of the complaint record for the past two years found no other complaints.There is no evidence that this event was related to a device defect or malfunction.The exact cause of the reported event cannot be definitively determined based on the available information.All available information has been placed on file in quality assurance at the manufacturing facility for appropriate tracking, trending and follow-up.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURSHIELD WINGED INFUSION SET
Type of Device
SET, ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO MEDICAL PRODUCTS HANGZHOU
m4-9-5, hangzhou economic &
technological development zone
hangzhou, 31001 8
CH  310018
Manufacturer (Section G)
TERUMO MEDICAL PRODUCTS HANGZHOU
reg. no. 3004102031
m4-9-5, hangzhou economic &
technological development zone, hangzhou 31001 8
CH   310018
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer suh
reg. no 2243441
2101 cottontail ln.
somerset, NJ 08873
8002837866
MDR Report Key6574175
MDR Text Key75418661
Report Number3004102031-2017-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FPA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K031266
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/17/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2019
Device Catalogue Number1SV*S23BL
Device Lot Number160827B
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/25/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/27/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-