The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of reay1182 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a tear in the catheter was confirmed, and the cause was determined to be use related.The external segment of a 23cm equistream xk was returned for investigation.The d/l tubing had been cut 7mm distal to the bifurcation and the distal segment of catheter was not returned for investigation.Adhesive residue from what was most likely a dressing was observed on the extension legs, bifurcation, and d/l tubing.A 2.1cm longitudinal split was observed in the extension leg with the blue luer adaptor.The extension leg exhibited deformation from ballooning along the length of the split, which is indicative of overpressurization.The dimensions of the extension leg distal to the split were within specification.No damage or defects related to the manufacturing process were observed on the catheter.The ifu indicates that infusion pressures must not exceed 25 psi (172 kpa).The use of a 10 ml or larger syringe is recommended because smaller syringes generate more pressure than larger syringes.
|