The reason for this revision surgery was due to a torn medial collateral ligament (mcl).The previous surgery and the revision detailed in this investigation occurred over 8 months apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the implant device history records (dhr) shows that the reported components used in the previous surgery met design and manufacturing requirements.There was a non-conforming material reports (ncmr) # (b)(4) associated with the part 233-01-112, 3d knee cemented femoral component, size 12, which documents a non-conformance that out of (b)(4) quantity lot (b)(4) items were rejected due to out of tolerance features in anterior-posterior box geometry and these parts were sent to supplier to bend within specification.After these were reworked with suitable solution, (b)(4) of the rejected items were accepted and 1b)(4) rejected item was scrapped.In total, (b)(4) out of (b)(4) items in the lot were accepted.The device was within its expiration date at the time of use during the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are in need of review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to torn mcl.The root cause of the torn mcl was reported as a fall; and the patient was not wearing their brace.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|