• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS TROPONIN I ES REAGENT PACK; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS TROPONIN I ES REAGENT PACK; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6802301
Device Problems Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456); Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/31/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation determined that lower than expected troponin i es results were obtained from proficiency samples while using a vitros 5600 integrated system.A definitive assignable cause could not be determined.The most likely assignable cause for the lower than expected vitros tropi es cap proficiency sample results is an unknown sample related issue with the cap proficiency samples.There is no indication that the vitros 5600 integrated system or the vitros tropi es reagent malfunctioned in any way.Based on historical quality control results, a vitros tropi es lot 2420 performance issue is not a likely contributor to the event.However, the customer does not process a control fluid with a troponin i concentration at, or below the url.Therefore, the performance of the vitros tropi es reagent lot 2390 at, or below the url concentration of 0.034 ng/ml cannot be determined and a reagent issue could not be entirely ruled out.
 
Event Description
The customer obtained lower than expected troponin i es results from college of american pathologists (cap) proficiency samples processed on a vitros 5600 integrated system.Cap cr-02 result of 0.02 ng/ml versus the expected result of 0.094 ng/ml.Cap cr-05 result of 0.03 ng/ml versus the expected result of 0.125 ng/ml.The lower than expected vitros tropi es cap proficiency fluid results were from non-patient fluids and were reported to the proficiency provider by the customer.Biased results of the direction and magnitude observed could lead to inappropriate physician action if occurred undetected with patient samples.There was no report of affected patient samples, however; the investigation cannot rule out that patient sample results were affected or would not be affected if the event were to recur undetected.There was no allegation of patient harm as a result of this event.This report corresponds to ortho clinical diagnostics inc.Complaint number (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS TROPONIN I ES REAGENT PACK
Type of Device
IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
100 indigo creek drive
rochester NY 14626
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
felindre meadows
pencoed
bridgend, wales CF35 5PZ
UK   CF35 5PZ
Manufacturer Contact
james a stevens
100 indigo creek drive
rochester, NY 14626
5854533000
MDR Report Key6604314
MDR Text Key77010215
Report Number3007111389-2017-00071
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MMI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/01/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/10/2017
Device Catalogue Number6802301
Device Lot Number2420
Other Device ID Number10758750002504
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/03/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-