• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ BURR; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK ROTALINK¿ BURR; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number H802227680020
Device Problems Kinked (1339); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/17/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.Returned product consisted of the rotalink burr catheter device.The burr, annulus, sheath, coil, and handshake connection were microscopically and visually examined.Majority of the coil was received kinked underneath the sheath.The handshake connection was received inside the housing and would not retract back out due to damage to the distal end of the sheath.The housing was dismantled and it was revealed that the handshake connection was stuck inside the sheath and the coil was kinked and stretched next to the handshake connection inside the sheath.The sheath had excessive wear inside the sheath at the location of the damaged coil and the handshake connection.The distal end of the sheath had a partial separation and was stretched and twisted.The sheath was pulled over the burr.The guidewire used in the procedure was not returned for product analysis, so functional testing was completed with a test rotawire.The rotawire would not advance pass the damaged coil.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is considered handling damage as the event occurred without direct patient contact.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It as reported that the shaft was kinked and the burr will not load onto guidewire.A 1.25mm rotalink¿ burr was selected for use.During procedure while attaching the burr and advancer, it was noticed that there was a kink on the burr catheter.Consequently, the physician was not able to negotiate the burr over the wire.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported.However, device analysis revealed that the distal end of the sheath had a partial separation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTALINK¿ BURR
Type of Device
CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
business and technology park
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6613120
MDR Text Key76727074
Report Number2134265-2017-05363
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCX
UDI-Device Identifier08714729185864
UDI-Public(01)08714729185864(17)20181231(10)20160507
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
P900056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/16/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/05/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2018
Device Model NumberH802227680020
Device Catalogue Number22768-002
Device Lot Number20160507
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/08/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/16/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-