(b)(4).Batch # p55a8h.The device history records were reviewed and the manufacturing criteria were met prior to the release of this lot.(b)(4).Additional information received from the sales rep: i was told patient was fine and they used another stapler to finish the procedure after they released locked stapler.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.What were the indications for surgery? what type of procedure was being performed? were any clips used in the procedure? did the issue occur on the first firing of the device? if not, which firing? what color cartridge was being used? was the device straight or articulated? did the device cut? did the device deliver any staples? if yes, please describe the formation of the staples? what troubleshooting steps were taken to open the device? how was the device broken apart? how was the procedure completed? what is the current patient status? the analysis results found that the ats45 device was received with the firing mechanism damaged and with a reload loaded in the device.The reload was received fully loaded with staples with the lockout spring normal.No functional test could be performed due to the condition of the device.The device was disassembled to verify the condition of the internal components and the firing trigger teeth were found broken.While no conclusion could be reached on what caused the firing mechanism to fail, it is possible that the device was attempted to fire on thicker tissue then indicated or attempted to fire through a locked reload in previous firings causing an increase of the internal forces resulting in the component yielding.It should be noted that a 100% inspections takes place during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the require specifications; in addition, a sample of the batch is inspected at (b)(4).
|