• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ASCENCION ORTHOPEDICS PIP SZ. 20 PROXIMAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ASCENCION ORTHOPEDICS PIP SZ. 20 PROXIMAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PIP-200-20P-WW
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 05/17/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Integra has completed their internal investigation on may 31, 2017 results: at this time, the implant has not been returned; therefore, no failure analysis can be performed.If the part is returned, the complaint will be updated accordingly.Dhr review; review of manufacturing records showed no evidence of a nonconformance that may have caused or contributed to the reported event.Complaints history; a trackwise search of the results of the short description field containing ¿pip-200-20p¿ showed 19 complaints of intra-operative pip fractures and/or breakages, including the report contained in this investigation.Conclusion: from january 2012 to present, there have been 5,767 pip surgeries performed.This represents a 0.33% (19/5,767) overall failure rate which does not represent an adverse trend.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the implant broke during a pyrocarbon pip arthroplasty.The surgeon had to do an extra hole in the phalanx to introduce a k-wire to contact the tip of the broken stem (which was stuck in the phalanx) to push it out.The event lead to 30 minutes surgical delay removing the broken implant stem.No patient consequences.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information received on june 13, 2017; the implant broke during impaction.Most probably caused by not broaching fully thereby causing the implant to contact the oblique bone cut before the vertical cut during impaction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Integra has completed their internal investigation on may 31, 2017.Results: at this time, the implant has not been returned; therefore, no failure analysis can be performed.If the part is returned, the complaint will be updated accordingly.Dhr review: review of manufacturing records showed no evidence of a nonconformance that may have caused or contributed to the reported event.Complaints history: a trackwise search of the results of the short description field containing ¿pip-200-20p¿ showed 19 complaints of intra-operative pip fractures and/or breakages, including the report contained in this investigation.From (b)(6) 2012 to present, there have been 5,767 pip surgeries performed.This represents a 0.33% (19/5,767) overall failure rate which does not represent an adverse trend.In addition, review of the complaints shows that the highest severity of complaints is moderate, which does not represent an adverse trend.Conclusion: as the implant has not been returned to date and no additional information has been provided, no root cause could be determined; however, possible causes include unsupported impacting; incorrect oblique cut or broaching direction; and instrument/tool or method related issues when tried to extract the implant.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Integra has completed their internal investigation on july 11, 2017.Results: evaluation of returned device; the complaint part was received in two pieces.Based on the visual analysis performed under the microscope, the failure mode of the part could not be discerned; however, the fracture appearance is consistent with a rapid brittle, bending fracture.Stem fractures are known to occur upon impact used to seat the prosthesis during surgical implantation into an incompletely broached medullary canal.Conclusion: while the part was returned and failure was confirmed, no root cause could be determined.Possible causes include unsupported impacting and incorrect oblique cut or broaching direction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIP SZ. 20 PROXIMAL
Type of Device
PIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
ASCENCION ORTHOPEDICS
8700 cameron road
8700 cameron road
austin TX 78754
Manufacturer (Section G)
ASCENSION ORTHOPEDICS
8700 cameron road #100
austin TX 78754
Manufacturer Contact
sonia irizarry
311 enterprise drive
plainsboro, NJ 08536
6099362393
MDR Report Key6623673
MDR Text Key77184865
Report Number1651501-2017-00020
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NEG
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
H010005
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/08/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberPIP-200-20P-WW
Device Lot Number162009T
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/07/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age40 YR
-
-