• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
Event Date 04/14/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that this date is based off of the date of publication of the article as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.The device was used for an off label indication.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Lim, lh., noma fitzrol, d., rajapathy, sk., tan, yc., sanihah, ah., kandasamy, r., wan hassan, wmn., badrisyah, i., abdul rahman izaini, g., zamzuri, i., tharakan, j., nunta-aree, s., jafri malin, a.Deep brain stimulation (dbs) for movement disorders: an experience in hospital universiti sains malaysia (husm) involving 12 patients.Malaysian journal of medical sciences.2017;24(2):87-93.Doi: 10.21315/mjms2017.24.2.11.Summary: deep brain stimulation (dbs) was first introduced in 1987 to the developed world.As a developing country malaysia begun its movement disorder program by doing ablation therapy using the radionics system.Hospital universiti sains malaysia a rural based teaching hospital had to take into consideration both health economics and outcomes in the area that it was providing neurosurgical care for when it initiated its deep brain stimulation program.Most of the patients were from the low to medium social economic groups and could not afford payment for a dbs implant.We concentrated our dbs services to parkinson's disease, tourette's syndrome and dystonia patients who had exhausted medical therapy.The case series of these patients and their follow-up are presented in this brief communication.Reported events: 1.Case 12: a (b)(6) male with deep brain stimulation (dbs) of the medial thalamus for tourette¿s syndrome experienced an allergic reaction to the device shortly after implant so the device was removed.It was not possible to ascertain specific device information from the article or to match the reported event with any previously reported event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6624659
MDR Text Key77231677
Report Number3007566237-2017-02268
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MFR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMY
PMA/PMN Number
H050003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/08/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/17/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age22 YR
-
-