• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); High impedance (1291); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Date 05/24/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Other application components are: product id: 977a260, serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2015, product type: lead.Product id: 977a260, serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2015, product type: lead.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer via a manufacturing representative regarding a patient who implanted with a nuerostimulator for non-malignant pain and failed back surgery syndrome.It was reported that the patient had a lack of pain relief and occasional jolting from the device.The representative ran impedances at 0.7, 1.5, and 3v and at all levels only 2,3,4,5 electrodes were below 10, 20, and 40k respectively.At 3,0v, 0,7 and 10 electrodes were high but still under 40k.The representative tried reprogramming but the event remains unresolved.No further complications were reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The event date is unknown.***information regarding the out of range impedances were previously captured in manufacturer¿s report # 3004209178-2017-01435.Any further information regarding this event will now be captured in this manufacturer's report.*** if information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative on 2016-12-28 which reported that electrodes 12 and 15 were out of range, so the manufacturer representative reprogrammed with other electrodes, and the issue was resolved at the time of the report on 2016-12-28.Additional information was received from a consumer regarding the patient on 2017-06-02.It was reported that there was no stimulation and shocking.The patient has never gotten the same coverage with the permanent implant that he did during his trial.He doesn¿t use the device often because it is not effective.He met with a manufacturer representative roughly three or four months prior to the report (confirmed as 2017) who indicated that a couple of contacts weren¿t functioning and there was no impedance.There were discussions around possible replacement of the lead or relocating it.More recently (late (b)(4) 2017) after he charged the implant and turned it on, there was no stimulation.He tried changing the settings, but there was still nothing.The following day when he was walking down the stairs, he felt a jolt in the left side.He turned down the settings.On the day of the report when he moved a little to the right, he got it again (a pretty hard shock).The patient met with a manufacturer representative on 2017-06-12 regarding the lack of pain relief and occasional jolting which had started about 3 weeks prior to the report.There was no relevant event that led up to the change per the patient.Impedances were run at 0.7 volts, 1.5 volts, and 3 volts and at all levels, only electrodes 2, 3, 4, and 5 were below 10,000 ohms, 20,000 ohms, and 40.000 ohms; respectively.At 3.0 volts, electrodes 0, 7, and 10 also came in high, but under 40,000 ohms.The health care provider had discussed surgery with the patient after reprogramming the patient to the remaining electrodes.After reprogramming the active electrodes, the coverage was in the right area of his body.The issue was not resolved at the time of the report.A surgery was planned, but not yet scheduled, and no further actions had yet been taken to resolve the issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6641368
MDR Text Key77621074
Report Number3004209178-2017-12905
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109483
UDI-Public00643169109483
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/26/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/14/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2016
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/02/2017
Date Device Manufactured04/06/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age53 YR
Patient Weight98
-
-