• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK-CNV DCS ORBIT
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Nerve Damage (1979)
Event Date 01/01/2007
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This is initial/final mdr report being submitted with associated mfr# 3008264254-2017-00087 literature article attached to this report.Brand name unavailable, catalog# unknown, udi unavailable, lot unknown.Concomitant products: microcatheter (excelsior, excel 14 or sl-10; boston scientific, (b)(4)); guglielmi detachable coils (gdc; boston scientific, (b)(4)), cook¿s detachable coils (cdc; cook inc.) neither the catalogue number nor the lot number was available thus neither dhr nor fal could be completed.Palsy, described as neurologic deficits, are known potential adverse event associated with the use of the codman embolic coil devices.Although there is not product specific information available, all products undergo a 100% inspection prior to being released for sale; there is no evidence of a manufacturing issue related to this complaint.Review of the available information suggests that the specific target lesion, and pre-existing symptoms of such, may have contributed to the report of palsy.There is no evidence of manufacturing related issues.No further actions are required at this time.
 
Event Description
In the literature article ¿efficacy of endovascular surgery for unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms presenting with cranial nerve symptoms¿ by s.Suzuki, a.Kurata, s.Kan, m.Yamada, j.Niki, i.Yuzawa, k.Sato, k.Iwamoto, h.Oka, and k.Fujii, published interventional neuroradiology 13 (suppl 1): 163-169, 2007, it was reported that patient # 17, a (b)(6) female, had temporary worsening of symptoms after implantation of unknown trufil dcs coils.Per the article: ¿whether endovascular surgery is able to reduce the mass effects of unruptured aneurysms is still controversial, although some reports have suggested efficacy in cases of internal carotid artery aneurysms with cranial nerve palsy.Here we assessed outcome in a series of cases.Eighteen patients with un-ruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms presenting with cranial nerve palsy were treated by endovascular surgery.The patients were two males and 16 females aged from 19 to 84 (mean 59.6 years).Aneurysms were located in the cavernous portion in 14, at the origin in one and at the origin of p-com in three.The aneurysms were all embolized using guglielmi detachable coils, interlocking detachable coils, cook¿s detachable coils or trufill dsc and detachable balloons were applied to occlude the proximal parent artery.We analyzed the efficacy of endovascular surgery for such aneurysms retrospectively.The mean aneurysm size was 21.4 mm and the mean follow-up period was 57.7 months.Palsy of iind cranial nerve was evident in three patients, of the iiird in eight, of the vth and vth in one each, and of the vith in nine.Post embolization occlusion was complete in nine patients and neck remnant in the other seven.Regarding complications of endovascular surgery, one case (5.6%) showed tia after embolization.Overall 11 (46%) cranial nerve symptoms showed complete resolution, eight (33%) showed some improvement, and five (21%) were unchanged.In three cases (12.5%), the symptoms worsened after treatment.The shorter the duration of symptoms was a factor predisposing to resolution of symptoms.In complete resolution cases, the timing of treatment after symptoms appeared and the time of complete resolution were in proportion.These results showed that there is no difference in reduction of mass effects between surgical clipping and endovascular surgery for unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms.With endovascular surgery, the rapidity of treatment after symptoms is the most important factor for successful results.¿ at the time of complaint entry no device specific information, i.E.Catalogue/lot number, is available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount dr
raynham MA
Manufacturer Contact
karen anigbo
circuito interior norte #1820
juarez chihuahua 32580
MX   32580
5088288374
MDR Report Key6651119
MDR Text Key77886660
Report Number3008264254-2017-00087
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/26/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/19/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-CNV DCS ORBIT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/26/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age58 YR
-
-