• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: INTERSECT ENT; DRUG-ELUTING SINUS STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

INTERSECT ENT; DRUG-ELUTING SINUS STENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Bacterial Infection (1735)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Bacteremia is exceedingly rare in chronic sinusitis.The instructions for use list infection as a potential risk associated with use of the steroid-eluting sinus implant(s).In an abundance of caution, intersect ent is reporting this event as an adverse event based on the information we received and the remote possibility the complication was caused by use of the implant rather than merely correlated with its placement the patient's weight is not known to the manufacturer.Date of the event was approximately 3 ½ weeks post operatively.The physician could not recollect the model of the device used, was either propel (model 70011) or propel mini (model number 60011).The following is being provided as this device is a combination product: name: propel or propel mini, dose, frequency & route used: (1) 370 ug implant, diagnosis for use: sinus surgery.Combination product -yes.Reference mfr report number 3008301917-2017-0007 for first implant in this bilateral case.
 
Event Description
Patient underwent bilateral total ethmoidectomy and maxillary antrostomy during which bilateral steroid-eluting sinus implants were placed in the ethmoid cavities.Bioresorbable nasal packing product was placed within the implant on each side.No polyps or infection were encountered during surgery.Blood loss was minimal and the surgery was uneventful.Postoperatively, the patient was on oral antibiotics for 10 days and twice daily saline irrigations.Postoperative appointments occurred weekly.The first two appointments were reported to be uneventful and included endoscopy and debridement, the implants were left in place.At the third postoperative appointment, the patient reported feeling poorly.The examining physician noted pus in the sinuses, worse on the right.Cultures were obtained and grew non-resistant staphylococcal species.The patient was started on augmentin.Subsequently, approximately 3 ½ weeks postoperatively, the patient presented to the emergency room and reportedly appeared toxic.A ct was obtained and showed diffuse inflammation in the operated sinuses, but no evidence of orbital wall dehiscence, or paranasal abscess formation.Blood cultures were obtained (eventually grew staphylococcal species), the patient was admitted and placed on iv antibiotics.The patient improved and discharged to home without further medical or surgical intervention.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
DRUG-ELUTING SINUS STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
INTERSECT ENT
1555 adams dr
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer (Section G)
INTERSECT ENT
1555 adams dr
menlo park CA 94025
Manufacturer Contact
amy wolbeck
1555 adams dr
menlo park, CA 94025
6506412115
MDR Report Key6659334
MDR Text Key78129972
Report Number3008301917-2017-00008
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OWO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100044
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/21/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-