Patient information is not available for reporting.Additional device product code: hty.Implant and explant dates: device broke intra-operatively, partial device remained in the patient.Device was not fully implanted or explanted.Initial reporter telephone number: (b)(6).A device history record (dhr) review was performed for part # 292.620, lot # 9931569: manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 25 april 2016: no non conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production that would contribute to the complaint condition.The review of the device history record shows that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to the complaint condition.The device has been received and the product evaluation is in progress.No conclusion can be drawn.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Product development investigation was completed.Received condition: the guidewire ø1.25 w/thread-tip w/trocar l150 has been received with the entire threaded tip broken off.The broken off portion measuring approximately 5 mm is not available for investigation.The device is slightly bent.There are visible slight striations on the remaining shaft.Dimension: because of the missing front portion the complaint relevant dimensions cannot be checked for dimensional accuracy of the valid manufacturing specifications.The remaining shaft diameter was measured and found to meet the specifications.Target dimension of shaft outside diameter 1.25 +0/- 0.07 mm; actual dimension of shaft outside diameter 1.23 mm / pass.Dhr review: the manufacturing documents were reviewed and no complaint related issues were found.This device was manufactured with a lot size of 266 pieces in march 2016.The review of the device history record shows that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to the complaint condition and the correct material 1.4112 / iso 5832-1/d stainless steel was used.Conclusion: a final manufacturing conclusion cannot be presented because of the condition of the product and the received poor clinical information.We determine that the most probable root cause is excessive force through the method of use and associated accumulated damage and wear.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|