• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: KANEKA CORPORATION LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

KANEKA CORPORATION LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LF2-R90
Device Problems Material Puncture/Hole (1504); Material Separation (1562); Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 06/05/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
- the concerned device "lacrifast" is not distributed in the us under this device name, but is identical to the device "lacriflow lacrimal stent" distributed in the us under 510(k) # k120886.- the actual device used was returned and investigated: no deformation or damage was found in the pair of tubes except for missing the stainless-steel ring mounted in the tip of the tube (colored in clear).- the ring's whereabouts was not confirmed during the procedure in this eye clinic, and accordingly, the missing stainless steel ring might have been remaining in the patient body.- as a possible cause of the penetration of the bougie and dropping off the ring during the use, we speculate as follows: when the doctor tried to insert and advance the tube with the bougie inserted in the tube forcibly in the completely occluded nasal duct, excessive mechanical force was loaded on the ring, where the tip of the bougie touched, and the bougie together with the ring penetrated out of the opening duct in the tip of the tube.
 
Event Description
This device "lacrifast", the lacrimal duct tube, was employed to treat the epiphora due to nasal duct complete occlusion.The doctor tried but failed in opening the occluded nasal duct by inserting a nasal endoscope.Then, he inserted one of the tube (colored in clear) of this device into the nasal duct directly by using the bougie included in this device.While advancing the tube, the doctor felt that the bougie penetrated out of the tube and retrieved it from the patient and found that the stainless-steel ring mounted in the tip of the tube was missing.He used another lacrifast to complete the operation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LACRIFAST
Type of Device
LACRIMAL STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
KANEKA CORPORATION
2-3-18
nakanoshima, kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8 288
JA  530-8288
Manufacturer Contact
kazuhiko inoue
2-3-18
nakanoshima,kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8-288
JA   530-8288
31814120
MDR Report Key6666130
MDR Text Key78396113
Report Number9614654-2017-00012
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OKS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/26/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Catalogue NumberLF2-R90
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/06/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-