The customer obtained questionable high test results for three patient samples using the ureal urea/bun (bun) assay on the cobas 4000 c (311) stand alone system (c311).The physician questioned all results, and the samples were sent to another laboratory where the results were "normal." of the three samples, only the result data for one sample was provided.All results are in units of mg/dl, and all were released outside of the laboratory.The initial result was 55.The physician questioned the result, so the sample was sent to another laboratory.The result from the second laboratory's roche c6000 instrument was 15.On (b)(6) 2017, the customer recalibrated the bun assay and repeated the sample on their c311.The result was 15.Both results of 15 were deemed correct.No adverse event occurred.The bun reagent lot number is 21831701 with an expiration date of 10/31/2017.After the event, the customer continued to test bun on their c311, and was performing qc on the assay twice per day.The field service representative found that the sample probe was not aligned properly over the rinse station which prevented the probe from getting a proper outside rinse.He performed a sample probe alignment over the rinse station, check all other alignment positions, and checked the rinse mechanism for proper fluidics function.Qc was acceptable, and the customer would run qc every four hours to monitor.The customer did not feel that a sample probe misalignment issue was the cause.The customer agreed the bun reagent had been on-board the analyzer for two weeks and the calibration curve could have drifted out of specification.After the assay was recalibrated, the issue seemed to resolve.Investigation activities are ongoing.
|