• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) CRE PRO GI; DILATOR, ESOPHAGEAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) CRE PRO GI; DILATOR, ESOPHAGEAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M00558760
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/08/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The complainant was unable to provide the device lot number.Therefore, the manufacture and expiration dates are unknown.(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a cre pro gi wireguided dilatation balloon was used in the esophagus during an esophageal stenosis dilation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2017.According to the complainant, after dilation, upon removing the device from the endoscope the balloon and exit marker got caught in the endoscope and could not be removed.The exit marker was noted to have bunched up.Reportedly, the device was removed and retrieved by cutting the catheter on the distal tip side of the endoscope.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results: a visual examination of the complaint device revealed that the catheter was cut.The exit marker was noted to be bunched up along its length.This failure is likely due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure limited the performance of the device.Therefore, the most probable root cause is operational context.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a cre pro gi wireguided dilatation balloon was used in the esophagus during an esophageal stenosis dilation procedure performed on (b)(6) 2017.According to the complainant, after dilation, upon removing the device from the endoscope the balloon and exit marker got caught in the endoscope and could not be removed.The exit marker was noted to have bunched up.Reportedly, the device was removed and retrieved by cutting the catheter on the distal tip side of the endoscope.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CRE PRO GI
Type of Device
DILATOR, ESOPHAGEAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key6681524
MDR Text Key78958908
Report Number3005099803-2017-01979
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K971320
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/09/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/30/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM00558760
Device Catalogue Number5876
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/22/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/07/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-