• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT GERMANY ARCHITECT HAVAB IGG REAGENT; ARCHITECT HAVAB-IGG

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT GERMANY ARCHITECT HAVAB IGG REAGENT; ARCHITECT HAVAB-IGG Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 06C29-27
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/01/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
An evaluation is in process.A follow-up report will be submitted when the evaluation is complete.Age at time of event, the patients were between 30 and 50 years old, however a specific age for each patient was not provided.This report is being filed on an international product, list number 6c29 that has a similar product distributed in the us, list number 6c27.
 
Event Description
The customer observed multiple falsely elevated (b)(6) patient results while using the architect (b)(6) reagents.The following data was provided (s/co).Sid (b)(6) initial 1.60 ((b)(6)), repeat 1.85 ((b)(6)).Sid (b)(6) initial 1.02 ((b)(6)), repeat 0.88 ((b)(6)).Sid (b)(6) initial 1.21 ((b)(6)), repeat 1.17 ((b)(6)).Sid (b)(6) initial 3.50 ((b)(6)), no repeat provided.Sid (b)(6) initial 2.77 ((b)(6)), no repeat provided.Sid (b)(6) initial 3.29 ((b)(6)), no repeat provided.The customer stated that all the patients are healthy and were being tested for occupational health issues.No impact to patient management was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional patients were included.Device manufacturers only 10.This report is being filed on an international product, list number 6c29.The similar product distributed in the us list number was changed to 6l27 from 6c27.An evaluation is in process.
 
Event Description
The customer observed multiple falsely elevated igg anti-hav patient results while using the architect havab-igg reagents.The following data was provided (s/co).Sid (b)(6) initial 1.60 (reactive), repeat 1.85 (reactive).Sid (b)(6) initial 1.02 (reactive), repeat 0.88 (nonreactive).Sid (b)(6) initial 1.21 (reactive), repeat 1.17 (reactive).Sid (b)(6) initial 3.50 (reactive), no repeat provided.Sid (b)(6) initial 2.77 (reactive), no repeat provided.Sid (b)(6) initial 3.29 (reactive), no repeat provided.Sid (b)(6) initial 2.03 (reactive), no repeat provided, previous result for this patient from 2016 was 1.98 (reactive).Sid (b)(6) initial 1.99 (reactive), repeat 2.16 (reactive), previous result for this patient from 2016 was 1.6 (reactive) and elisa negative.Sid (b)(6) initial 1.73 (reactive), previous result for this patient from 2016 was 1.15 (reactive).Sid (b)(6) initial 1.98 (reactive), repeat 2.19 (reactive).The customer stated that all the patients are healthy and were being tested for occupational health issues.No impact to patient management was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the customer issue included a review of the complaint text, a search for similar complaints, device history review, labeling review, returned specimen testing, and specificity testing.No adverse trend was identified for the customer issue.Device history review did not identify any issues that may have caused the customer issue.Labeling was reviewed and found to be adequate.Four patient specimens were returned, however the product was not available for return.Specimens sid (b)(6) were tested with retained kits of the likely cause reagent lot and were also tested using other methods, including vidas anti-hav total method and biorad monolisa total anti hav plus method.The four specimens were reactive using the architect method (lots 70628li00 and 72320li00) and the biorad method.The specimens were also reactive using the vidas method, with the exception of sid (b)(6), which was borderline.The customer stated that this patient sid (b)(6) had received two doses of hav vaccine prior to the sample being drawn.Additionally, clinical specificity testing of negative control replicates was performed using retained kits stored at the recommended storage condition.Specificity testing met all specifications.Based on all available information and abbott diagnostics complaint investigation, no systematic issue was identified and no product deficiency was identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARCHITECT HAVAB IGG REAGENT
Type of Device
ARCHITECT HAVAB-IGG
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT GERMANY
max-planck-ring 2
wiesbaden 65205
GM  65205
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT GERMANY
max-planck-ring 2
wiesbaden 65205
GM   65205
Manufacturer Contact
noemi romero-kondos, rn bsn
100 abbott park road
dept. 09b9, lccp1-3
abbott park, IL 60064-3537
224667-512
MDR Report Key6688171
MDR Text Key79148545
Report Number3002809144-2017-00108
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSP
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/05/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2017
Device Catalogue Number06C29-27
Device Lot Number70628LI00
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/01/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-