• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG CAPSTONE PTC SPINAL SYSTEM; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG CAPSTONE PTC SPINAL SYSTEM; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3992210
Device Problem Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Disability (2371); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Two lots of the suspect device was identified, however it is unknown which one is the complaint product.The lots that were used lot h5294239, lot no.H5301699.(b)(4).Device was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, we are unable to determine the definitive cause of the re ported event.Product image review: review of submitted images did not identify significant material deformation, crack or fracture.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (tlif) at l4-5.In the surgery 2 cages were implanted.The rear part of one of the cages was placed at the same position as the posterior wall at l5.The surgery was performed without problem.However, postoperatively, the cage placed at the same position with posterior wall at l5 was found to be backed-out excessively.Cauda equine was pressured by the backed-out cage which caused pain.The patient suffered disability due to this event.Only one cage was backed out but it is unknown which one backed out.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: x rays image review: l4-5 plif performed by placing two cages from same side.10x22 mm interbody grafts were placed.Post op xrays show these to be placed very laterally and one of the cage is backed out.Suspect the lateral interbody space cannot accommodate these size grafts.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: visual and optical examination did not identify crack, fracture, or significant deformation.Dimensional examination of the overall length, width, and height found the implant conforms to print specifications.Visual comparison of the complaint returned implant form with sample comparison part did not identify material deviation from design form.Unable to determine root cause of the implant migration from the available information.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAPSTONE PTC SPINAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG
barrio marianna rd 909, km0.4
humacao PR 00792
Manufacturer (Section G)
MDT SOFAMOR DANEK PUERTO RICO MFG
barrio marianna rd 909, km0.4
humacao PR 00792
Manufacturer Contact
stacie ziemba
1800 pyramid place
memphis, TN 38132
9013963133
MDR Report Key6700102
MDR Text Key79573236
Report Number1030489-2017-01729
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAX
UDI-Device Identifier00643169187535
UDI-Public00643169187535
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K133205
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/11/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number3992210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/14/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/03/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age33 YR
-
-