• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK VAPR S90 ELECTRODE 4.0MM, 90° SUCTION W/INTEGRATED HANDPIECE; VAPR ELECTRODES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK VAPR S90 ELECTRODE 4.0MM, 90° SUCTION W/INTEGRATED HANDPIECE; VAPR ELECTRODES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 225370
Device Problems Device Or Device Fragments Location Unknown (2590); Sparking (2595)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 06/13/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The affiliate reported via email the patient had recurrent acromioclavicular dislocation in the past three years.He had acromioclavicular fixation operation on (b)(6) 2017.However, the device's ceramic head broke during using.The broken pieces were not found and could not determine the location.Changed the same like product to complete the operation.It prolonged operation time about half hour.Now the patient is in good condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual inspection of the device revealed a melted and burnt manifold from the 4 o¿clock to 7 o¿clock positions.Upon further visual observation, the ceramic material on the active tip is broken off from the 4 o¿clock to 7 o¿clock positions, thus confirming this complaint.The metal faceplate of the active tip was also found to be crooked.Saline residue was found inside the suction tube.Visual signs of activation were found at the active tip.Plugging the device into the generator, all defaults were displayed.Sparking was identified in both cut and coag.Modes due to the broken ceramic head.If the sparking and arcing occurred during use, it may have contributed to the ceramic head to burn and deteriorate, causing the ceramic material to weaken and eventually brake.Other than this possibility a specific root cause cannot be determined.The supplier completed a capa investigation to address this failure, and training requirements were updated to be performed on a six month basis.The dhr review indicated that this lot of devices was processed without incident therefore, there is no evidence of manufacturing anomalies on the records reviewed.Review of the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed two other complaints (four total devices) of this lot number with a similar failure mode but one complaint with a different root cause for this lot of devices released to distribution.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VAPR S90 ELECTRODE 4.0MM, 90° SUCTION W/INTEGRATED HANDPIECE
Type of Device
VAPR ELECTRODES
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer lawrence
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5089776860
MDR Report Key6709278
MDR Text Key79888626
Report Number1221934-2017-10354
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122425
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/16/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/12/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2019
Device Catalogue Number225370
Device Lot NumberU1602047
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/12/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer06/16/2017
Date Manufacturer Received08/10/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/04/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-