• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS COMPREHENSIVE REVERSE SHOULDER HUMERAL BEARING ARCOMXL; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS COMPREHENSIVE REVERSE SHOULDER HUMERAL BEARING ARCOMXL; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Material Erosion (1214)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Tissue Damage (2104)
Event Date 10/04/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).(b)(4).Concomitant medical products-baseplate catalog#:010000589 lot#:184750, locking screw catalog#:180550 lot#:808790, screw catalog#:180560 lot#:119660, bearing catalog#:xl-115363 lot#:169800, screw catalog#:115396 lot#:399510.The device has been received by zimmer biomet (b)(4) for evaluation.Once the investigation is complete, a follow-up report will be submitted.Multiple mdr reports were filed for this event, please see associated reports: 0001825034-2017-02775, 0001825034-2017-04973, 0001825034-2017-04976, 0001825034-2017-04977,0001825034-2017-04979.
 
Event Description
It is reported the patient underwent a right total shoulder arthroplasty revision approximately four months post-implantation due to disassociation of the taper from the baseplate.Additional information received in revision operative notes, also notes the patient was experiencing pain and a grinding sensation prior to revision.During the revision, significant liner erosion was noted, and the baseplate was found to be loose, with marked glenoid bone deficiency.All components, except the humeral stem, were removed and replaced.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following report is submitted to relay additional information.The reported event is confirmed with review of the provided surgical notes as well as the returned products.Visual examination showed gouges, nicks and excessive wear.This visual abrasion confirms the migration of the glenosphere, which is evidence of disassociation.Among the returned items was a screw not compatible with the other implants; while this could have been a contributing factor it cannot be confirmed whether this screw was used in the primary procedure.Device history record (dhr) was reviewed and no discrepancies were found.Review of the complaint history determined that no further action is required.A definitive root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMPREHENSIVE REVERSE SHOULDER HUMERAL BEARING ARCOMXL
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
christina arnt
56 e. bell dr.
warsaw, IN 46582
5745273773
MDR Report Key6715197
MDR Text Key80089617
Report Number0001825034-2017-04978
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PAO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK080642
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/14/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/16/2021
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberXL-115363
Device Lot Number169800
Other Device ID NumberREFERENCE H10
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/26/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/01/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/16/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient Weight66
-
-