Catalog Number 1120350-33 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Failure to Advance (2524); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
Numbness (2415)
|
Event Date 06/08/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The customer reported the device was discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately tortuous, heavily calcified de novo mid circumflex artery.Radial access was used.Pre-dilatation was performed with an unspecified 2.0 mm balloon catheter.A 3.5 x 33 mm xience alpine stent was being advanced to the lesion; however, it could not cross.During withdrawal, there was resistance when the stent was re-entering the guiding catheter so the entire system was removed together.When the devices got to the radial sheath, the stent dislodged and went into the radial artery.An attempt was made to remove the stent but it remained in the radial artery.They moved to the femoral artery to complete the case where two 3.5 x 18 mm xience alpine stents were implanted in the circumflex.When the patient returned to the critical care unit, the patient had tingling in the hand and surgery was performed to remove the dislodged stent.The patient was discharged the same day.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal file number - (b)(4) the device was not returned for evaluation.A cine was received and reviewed by an abbott vascular clinical specialist.The imaging shows a close-up of the deployed stent with the delivery system almost fully removed from the deployed stent.There are not any images of the loose undeployed stent in the radial artery.In conclusion, it is confirmed that the patient had a loose stent in the radial artery as the stent was surgically removed.The loss of the stent from the delivery system is not within the imaging provided and thus it is not possible to determine a probable cause.It is likely that the stent was damaged when trying to be delivered past the calcific region of the artery and as a result unable to be removed first through the guide catheter and then secondarily through the introducer sheath.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|