• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON) O-ARM O2 IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON) O-ARM O2 IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number BI70002000
Device Problem Application Interface Becomes Non-Functional Or Program Exits Abnormally (1138)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/20/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
On 6/23/2017 a medtronic field service engineer visited the site to test the system: upon inspection, fse was not able to duplicate the reported issue.Logs confirmed recoverable error 134 (5vdc out of tolerance); old ps1 was @ 4.8vdc; replaced ps1 and adjusted to within tolerance @5.11; batteries tested good with stack checker; logs gathered and attached to case for further analysis ; system checkout passed.Clinical specialist verified accuracy and found the s7 camera to be dirty with a greasy film on the right lens.After cleaning, the o-arm and s7 were able to function as normal.Accuracy was within limits.Systems fully functional.Issue resolved.
 
Event Description
A site radiology tech (rt) called to report that during a spinal surgery, the image acquisition system (ias) began beeping a few minutes after being on.They were half way through the case and the o-arm stopped exposing.Reboot resolved the issue, they were able to take a full spin and several thereafter.No harm to patient.Delay less than an hour.Surgery completed with use of the o-arm system.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The software investigation found that the reported event was unrelated to a software issue.Log analysis found that when the generator error occurred, the 3d image acquisition was ceased due to the error being received.The software functioned as designed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The event reported in this 3500a also represents a potential accidental radiation occurrence (aro) per 21 cfr 1002.20(a).Per 21 cfr 1002.20(c), this event is being reported under part 803.Supplemental aro information is as follows: location of aro: (b)(6).Number of persons exposed: 1.Number of persons adversely affected: 0.Actions taken to control, correct, or eliminate: see narrative above and/or previous mdr submissions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The power supply was returned to the manufacturer for analysis.The supply was found to be fully functional with no problem found.The reported event could not be duplicated by medtronic personnel.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
O-ARM O2 IMAGING SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON)
300 foster street
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON)
300 foster street
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer Contact
peter verhey
attn:product quality experienc
826 coal creek circle
louisville, CO 80027-9710
7208902092
MDR Report Key6725973
MDR Text Key80496886
Report Number1723170-2017-02989
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OWB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151000
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Radiologic Technologist
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/23/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/19/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Radiologic Technologist
Device Catalogue NumberBI70002000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/29/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/24/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age54 YR
Patient Weight57
-
-