• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS BAERVELDT SHUNT; SURGICAL ADJUNCTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS BAERVELDT SHUNT; SURGICAL ADJUNCTS Back to Search Results
Model Number BG103-250
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Retinal Detachment (2047); Vitrectomy (2643); No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event - (b)(6) 2017.Udi # unknown was listed, since serial number of the device was not provided.Serial - unknown/not provided.Expiration date - is unknown since serial number of the device was not provided.Implant date - unknown, not provided.Explant date - unknown, not provided.Mfg date - unknown since serial number of the device was not provided.(b)(4).Journal citation: vinod k, panarelli jf, gentile rc, sidoti pa.Long-term outcomes and complications of pars plana baerveldt implantation in children.Journal of glaucoma.26(3)(2017):266-271.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
 
Event Description
From the glaucoma journal: long-term outcomes and complications of pars plana baerveldt implantation in children abstract: purpose of the study: the purpose of the study was to report long-term outcomes and complications of baerveldt glaucoma implant (bgi) surgery with pars plana tube insertion in children.Materials and methods: the medical records of consecutive aphakic and pseudophakic children (<16 y of age) who underwent bgi surgery with pars plana tube insertion between 1990 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.Main outcome measures were intraocular pressure and number of glaucoma medications.Postoperative complications were recorded.Failure was defined as an intraocular pressure <5 or >/=21 mm hg (with or without glaucoma medications), loss of light perception, or need for additional glaucoma surgery.Results: thirty-seven children were identified with a mean age of 6.0+/-4.7 years (range, 4 mo to 14.5 y).Mean follow-up after pars plana bgi surgery was 6.5+/-3.4 years (range, 9 mo to 12.8 y) for patients who met success criteria.Mean intraocular pressure and mean number of glaucoma medications at most recent follow-up for patients with successful intraocular pressure control were 13.8+/-4.1 and 2.3+/-1.9 mm hg, respectively.The kaplan-meier survival analysis revealed 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year success rates of 94.5%, 74.6%, 65.0%, and 45.8%, respectively.Complications included tube exposure in 1 patient (2.7%), tube obstruction in 8 patients (21.6%), and retinal detachment in 9 patients (24.3%).Seventeen patients (45.9%) failed due to inadequate intraocular pressure control, of whom 9 (24.3%) required additional glaucoma surgery.Conclusions: although pars plana bgi surgery is a reasonable option for managing refractory glaucoma in aphakic and pseudophakic children, surgeons must be aware of the potential need for additional glaucoma surgery and/or posterior segment complications with extended follow-up.One patient developed chronic hypotony due to a fixed funnel retinal detachment that was deemed inoperable.Complications requiring reoperation occurred in 18 patients, and included tube exposure in 1 patient, tube obstruction in 8 patients, and retinal detachment in 9 patients.One patient had a ruptured globe 14 months after pars plana baerveldt glaucoma implant (ppbgi), and required conjunctivoplasty for tube exposure 1 month after ruptured globe repair.Eight patients developed tube obstruction.Vitreous incarceration within the proximal tube lumen occurred in 7 patients, 6 of whom required additional pars plana vitrectomy.The last had spontaneous resolution of tube obstruction and iop normalized without surgery.One patient developed tube obstruction by iris 7 months postoperatively, requiring surgical revision.All 8 patients regained successful iop control after resolution of obstruction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the device was not returned to the manufacturing site.Therefore, product testing could not be performed and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing record cannot be reviewed since the serial number is unknown.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions along with warnings for the proper use and handling of the device.As a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BAERVELDT SHUNT
Type of Device
SURGICAL ADJUNCTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS
santa ana CA
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL OPTICS INC.
van swietenlaan 5
groningen 9728 NX
NL   9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
pamela mcclain
1700 east st. andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478243
MDR Report Key6739024
MDR Text Key80865703
Report Number9614546-2017-00662
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KYF
UDI-Public(01)
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K955455
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/31/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/24/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberBG103-250
Device Catalogue Number23030819
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-