• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

REVISION OPTICS RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY; CORNEAL INLAY Back to Search Results
Model Number PP6-530-0027-US
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Corneal Clouding/Hazing (1878); Blurred Vision (2137); Loss of Vision (2139); Visual Disturbances (2140)
Event Date 08/08/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information has been requested to confirm that the device was explanted as planned and request that it be returned for evaluation.The device history record (dhr) review of the manufacturing lot was performed and there were no discrepancies or unusual findings related to the reported issue.Corneal haze is listed in the device labeling as a known potential risk.Complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The subject was enrolled in the (b)(6) clinical trial and underwent implantation of the investigational corneal inlay in the left eye on (b)(6) 2013.Four years postoperatively, the patient presented with corneal haze and complained of poor near vision and headaches from eye strain.The patient was prescribed topical steroids, but requested inlay explantation (scheduled for (b)(6) 2017).Additional information has been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The explanted inlay was returned to the manufacturer and subjected to visual microscopic inspection and dimensional analysis.The edge thickness and diameter were measured and found to be within specifications.Scratches and debris were observed on the device, but these findings are consistent with findings for corneal inlays that have been explanted since surgical instruments are required to remove the device from the eye and place it in a hydrated storage container for transport.Decreased bcdva and visual symptoms are listed in the device labeling as known potential risks.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Patient follow-up was requested from the surgeon, who provided the following additional information.Corneal haze is characterized as grade 1, central.The patient's best corrected distance visual acuity (bcdva) decreased from 20/20 (preoperatively) to 20/25 at onset of issue.Corneal haze resulted in visual disturbances such as blurred vision, ghost images, double vision and fluctuation of vision which caused frequent headaches to the patient.Headache is described as mild to moderate when trying to focus at near.The inlay was explanted on (b)(6) 2017.Non-compliance with the prescribed steroid regimen is suspected to be contributory to the reported issues.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint reference #: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The investigator provided the following update on the study subject.At the one-month post-explant examination on (b)(6) 2017, bcdva was 20/25 and the patient reported experiencing moderate pain and aching.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAINDROP NEAR VISION INLAY
Type of Device
CORNEAL INLAY
Manufacturer (Section D)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer (Section G)
REVISION OPTICS
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest CA 92630 8835
Manufacturer Contact
pushpita singh
25651 atlantic ocean dr.,
ste. a1
lake forest, CA 92630-8835
9497072740
MDR Report Key6745513
MDR Text Key81112500
Report Number3005956347-2017-00075
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
G090149
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/20/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/26/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date09/01/2013
Device Model NumberPP6-530-0027-US
Device Lot Number002371
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/10/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/12/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
-
-