• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TENEX HEALTH TENEX HEALTH TX SYSTEM - MICROTIP; ULTRASONIC SURGICAL ASPIRATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TENEX HEALTH TENEX HEALTH TX SYSTEM - MICROTIP; ULTRASONIC SURGICAL ASPIRATOR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 554-2003-001
Device Problems Bent (1059); Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/07/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer reported that the needle had separated from the microtip.Needle separation was confirmed upon receipt of the handpiece.Due to the state in which the device was received functional testing could not be performed.The hypodermic needle had separated at the braze joint.This is the highest stress point along the length of the needle.There was no indication of severe side loading or contact with hard tissue.The immediate cause is material fatigue associated with and/or being caused by user error.It is suspected that non-axial motion by the user and bending of the needle during use contributed to the needle breaking.Lab testing, to date, has been unable to duplicate needle failure when appropriate axial technique is used in simulated use conditions, indicating the failure is not related to material defect.
 
Event Description
Per the information provided, this was the second time the doctor had used the device.He was doing a fibroma, working around the arch of the foot.The needle was bending a little bit and the needle broke.Cutting time at time of needle separation was 1:15 minutes.As the doctor removed the microtip from the patient's foot and he noticed that the needle was halfway out of the shaft.The needle did not lodge in the patient, it remained in the microtip as the device was removed from the patient.A second microtip was obtained and the procedure completed with that device.There was a 3 minute delay while devices were switched out and the patient was under general anesthesia.There was no harm, injury or complication to the patient caused by the failure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TENEX HEALTH TX SYSTEM - MICROTIP
Type of Device
ULTRASONIC SURGICAL ASPIRATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
TENEX HEALTH
26902 vista terrace
lake forest CA 92630
Manufacturer (Section G)
TENEX HEALTH
26902 vista terrace
lake forest CA 92630
Manufacturer Contact
alison baxter
26902 vista terrace
lake forest, CA 92630
9494547500
MDR Report Key6774508
MDR Text Key82109856
Report Number3009750704-2017-00109
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LFL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K153299
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/08/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/08/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/31/2018
Device Catalogue Number554-2003-001
Device Lot Number11017-03
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/17/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/10/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/20/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age49 YR
Patient Weight70
-
-