The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of ngax1139 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.The complaints for this lot number (ngax1139) have been reported from the same (b)(6) facility.Device not yet returned for evaluation.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a ruptured balloon on a tri-funnel device was confirmed and determined to be use related.A 18fr tri-funnel replacement device was returned for investigation.The device revealed evidence of use.Residue was found within the feeding tube.Discoloration was observed in the balloon.A complete split was observed around the midpoint of the balloon.Due to the breach in the balloon material, the balloon could not be inflated.A microscopic examination of the split revealed that the adjoining surfaces of the balloon were granular.The observed damage is consistent with a burst due to over-pressurization.The product ifu indicates to not exceed the maximum recommended inflation volume.It is unknown if feeding or medication was administered into the color-coded balloon inflation lumen.Residue was found within the tube near the red inflation valve.The steps for checking the balloon volume are outlined in the ifu and the correct inflation volume was printed on the valve of the returned device.It appears that the tri-funnel replacement device was damaged during use.
|