It was reported that a patient underwent an ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation with two thermocool smarttouch sf catheters and suffered a cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis.When the first thermocool smarttouch sf catheter (lot #: 17642858l) was placed in the patient, the vector displayed as inverted.Force vector inversion persisted upon contact with the anterior and posterior walls.Catheter was zeroed, catheter was reconnected, and cable was exchanged without resolution.The first thermocool smarttouch sf catheter was exchanged for the second thermocool smarttouch sf catheter (lot #: 17642825l) and the issue resolved.The force vector inversion issue noted on the first thermocool smarttouch sf catheter was assessed as not reportable as the potential risk that it could cause or contribute to a death or serious deterioration in state of health was remote.During the procedure, the sheath and/or the second thermocool smarttouch sf catheter seemed to be kinking and the catheter was difficult to handle.Catheter was forcibly maneuvered in the area of the left carina, which resulted in a perforation, as evidenced by a change in cardiac silhouette movement.Pericardiocentesis yielded an unspecified amount of fluid.Patient was transferred to the intensive care unit in stable condition.There is no information regarding extended hospitalization.Patient outcome is improved.It was noted that there were no difficulties with removing the catheter.No physical damage, such as exposed wires, was reported.It was noted that the adverse event might have occurred during mapping phase.There were no factors cited that may have contributed to the adverse event.Physician¿s opinion regarding the cause of the adverse event is that it was related to procedure or patient condition.Transseptal puncture was performed with an unspecified needle.There is no sheath information.Generator was set on power control mode.There is no information regarding generator settings, power titration, overall ablation time at the site of injury, last ablation cycle time at the site of injury, irrigated catheter flow setting, or anticoagulation during the procedure.There is no information regarding shaft proximity interference value, catheter proximity, or catheter zeroing.There were no errors reported on any bwi equipment during the procedure.Since this adverse event required medical or surgical intervention to preclude permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure, it is to be considered serious and mdr reportable.
|