• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS 8000 C 702 MODULE; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS 8000 C 702 MODULE; CLINICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYZER Back to Search Results
Model Number C702
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/01/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occurred in (b)(6).Unique identifier (udi)#: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer complained of erroneous results for 1 patient sample tested for alt alanine aminotransferase acc.To ifcc without pyridoxal phosphate activation (alt) and ast aspartate aminotransferase acc.To ifcc without pyridoxal phosphate activation(ast) on two cobas 8000 c 702 modules.Erroneous results were reported outside of the laboratory.This medwatch will cover c702 module with serial number (b)(4) (c702 module a).Refer to medwatch with (b)(6) for information on the c702 module with serial number (b)(4) (c702 module b) erroneous results.On (b)(6) 2017 the patient was initially tested on c702 module b and the ast result was 518.6 u/l.This result was reported outside of the laboratory.On (b)(6) 2017 the doctor asked for the sample to be repeated.The sample was repeated on c702 module a and the ast result was 566.6 u/l.The sample was then repeated on c702 module b and the ast result was 4467.8 u/l.The sample was repeated in decrease mode and the ast result from c702 module a was 292.9 u/l.On (b)(6) 2017 the patient was initially tested on c702 module b and the alt result was 232.9 u/l.The sample was repeated on c702 module b and the alt result was 5917.3 u/l.The sample was repeated in decrease mode and the alt result from c702 module b was 5902.3 u/l.The ast result of 292.9 u/l and the alt result of 5902.3 u/l were reported outside of the laboratory where the patient (who happens to be a doctor) questioned the low ast result.The ast result of 4467.8 u/l was believed to be correct.Two new samples were obtained on (b)(6) 2017 and the ast results were both > 4000 u/l.There was no allegation that an adverse event occurred.The last monthly maintenance prior to the event was performed on (b)(6) 2017 where cuvettes and the photometer were replaced.Calibration and quality controls were acceptable.A specific root cause was not identified.Additional information was requested for investigation but was not provided.Since calibration and qc were acceptable, both an instrument and reagent problem can be excluded as a root cause.The customer has not complained of any additional issues.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBAS 8000 C 702 MODULE
Type of Device
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY ANALYZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP.
882 ichige hitachinaka
na
ibaraki 312-8 504
JA   312-8504
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key6817765
MDR Text Key83862590
Report Number1823260-2017-01811
Device Sequence Number0
Product Code CIT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
K100853
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/24/2017
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberC702
Device Catalogue NumberASKU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/07/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-