• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS 6000 E 601 MODULE; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY ANALYZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS COBAS 6000 E 601 MODULE; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY ANALYZER Back to Search Results
Model Number E601
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/07/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Unique identifier (udi)#: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer stated that quality controls run for tests on measuring cell 2 of the cobas 6000 e 601 module (e601) were outside of range on the evening shift.The customer prepared fresh controls and repeated them, but they still recovered outside of range.The customer pulled several samples that were tested earlier in the day and repeated them on the other e601 analyzer.The results were not the same.The customer stated that they corrected reports for a total of approximately 300 results.Of the affected patient samples, the customer provided data for a total of 14 patient samples tested for the elecsys tsh assay (tsh), elecsys ferritin (ferr), and the elecsys hcg + beta test system (hcgb).Of these samples, 9 had erroneous initial results for tsh, ferr, and hcgb that were reported outside of the laboratory.All 9 samples were repeated on the other e601 analyzer and the repeat results were believed to be correct.The first sample initially had a tsh result of 0.59 uiu/ml and repeated as 0.92 uiu/ml.The second sample initially had a tsh result of 0.05 uiu/ml and repeated as 0.01 uiu/ml.The third sample initially had a tsh result of 3.1 uiu/ml and repeated as 9.8 uiu/ml.The fourth sample initially had a tsh result of 2.3 uiu/ml and repeated as 6.8 uiu/ml.The fifth sample initially had a ferr result of 7.1 ng/ml and repeated as 12 ng/ml.The sixth sample was diluted and initially had a ferr result of 5333 ng/ml, which repeated as 8487 ng/ml.The seventh sample initially had a ferr result of 4.0 ng/ml and repeated as 8.4 ng/ml.The eighth sample initially had a ferr result of 98 ng/ml and repeated as 406 ng/ml.The ninth sample initially had an hcgb result of 27 miu/ml and repeated as 50 miu/ml.No adverse events were alleged to have occurred with the patients.The tsh, ferr, and hcgb reagent lot numbers and expiration dates were asked for, but not provided.The field service engineer found that the pinch tubing was compromised and needed to be replaced.He replaced all pinch tubing and performed measuring cell preparation maintenance.He also primed the system.The customer ran calibration and quality controls successfully.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBAS 6000 E 601 MODULE
Type of Device
IMMUNOCHEMISTRY ANALYZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP.
882 ichige hitachinaka
na
ibaraki 312-8 504
JA   312-8504
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key6819796
MDR Text Key83750549
Report Number1823260-2017-01818
Device Sequence Number0
Product Code DHA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K060373
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/25/2017
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberE601
Device Catalogue Number04745922001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/07/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-