• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS DE MEXICO PRECISE OTW NITINOL SYS, 9X40; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS DE MEXICO PRECISE OTW NITINOL SYS, 9X40; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Catalog Number P09040XC
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 07/31/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product remains implanted and is thus not available for analysis.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with lot 17337069 presented no issues during the manufacturing process that can be related to the reported event.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event Description
As reported, an arterial perforation was noted at the distal edge of a precise over the wire (otw) nitinol sys, 9x40 stent.Initially the physician had deployed the stent with no issues.The stent was post dilated with an aviator.After the perforation was noted, a second precise stent (9x40) was placed and overlapped.The stents were post dilated with non-cordis balloons and the perforation appeared to have resolved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
After further review of additional information received the sections have been updated accordingly.As reported, an arterial perforation was noted at the distal edge of a precise over the wire (otw) nitinol sys, 9x40 stent.The lesion was mildly calcified and had moderate vessel tortuosity.The rate of stenosis was more than 60%.The device was stored and handled per the instructions for use (ifu).The device was prepped per the ifu and prepped normally.There was no difficulty tracking the stent deployment system through the lesion and there was no difficulty crossing the lesion.Initially the physician had deployed the stent with no issues.The stent was post dilated with an aviator.After the perforation was noted, a second precise stent (9x40) was placed and overlapped.The stents were post dilated with non-cordis balloons and the perforation appeared to have resolved.The patient¿s status is baseline.Additional procedural details were requested but are unknown.As reported, an arterial perforation was noted at the distal edge of a precise over the wire (otw) nitinol sys, 9x40 stent.The lesion was mildly calcified and had moderate vessel tortuosity.The rate of stenosis was more than 60%.The device was stored and handled per the instructions for use (ifu).The device was prepped per the ifu and prepped normally.There was no difficulty tracking the stent deployment system through the lesion and there was no difficulty crossing the lesion.Initially the physician had deployed the stent with no issues.The stent was post dilated with an aviator.After the perforation was noted, a second precise stent (9x40) was placed and overlapped.The stents were post dilated with non-cordis balloons and the perforation appeared to have resolved.The patient¿s status is baseline.Additional procedural details were requested but are unknown.The device was not returned for evaluation as it remains implanted.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with lot 17337069 presented no issues during the manufacturing process that can be related to the reported event.Without procedural films for review, the reported perforation could not be confirmed and a clinical conclusion could not be determined as to the cause of the event.However, based on the available information, vessel characteristics and/or procedural factors may have contributed to the reported event.Usage of the product other than that indicated in the product's ifu, which is not intended as mitigation, may involve additional risks not described in the labeling.Vessel injury is a well-known complication of stent implantation.According to the ifu, ¿upon deployment, the stent forms an open lattice and pushes outward on the luminal surface, helping to maintain the patency of the vessel.Due to the self-expanding behavior of nitinol, the stents are indicated for placement into vessels that are 1-2 mm smaller in diameter than the unconstrained diameter of the stent¿.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported event is related to the design and manufacturing process of the device.Therefore no corrective action will be taken.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRECISE OTW NITINOL SYS, 9X40
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS DE MEXICO
circuito int nte 1820
juarez 32575
MX  32575
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS DE MEXICO
circuito int nte 1820
juarez 32575
MX   32575
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60th ave
miami lakes, FL 33014
MDR Report Key6824697
MDR Text Key83798236
Report Number9616099-2017-01365
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier20705032035573
UDI-Public20705032035573
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030047
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/29/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2017
Device Catalogue NumberP09040XC
Device Lot Number17337069
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/18/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/23/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
AVIATOR 6X4; MUSTANG 5X4; MUSTANG 6X4; PRECISE 9X40
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
-
-